Global Positioning System (GPS) technology underpins vast segments of modern society—from coordinating supply chains and regulating financial transactions to guiding air traffic and synchronizing power grids. It’s deeply embedded into national infrastructure, economic systems, and strategic defense operations. Yet, a recent federal advisory panel has flagged serious concern: despite its foundational role, the GPS network remains acutely vulnerable and lacks the necessary support systems to safeguard its reliability.
The panel’s findings spotlight not just technical fragilities, but the broader risks posed by cybersecurity threats, jamming, spoofing, and dependency on a single signal source. These issues extend beyond infrastructure—they ripple into questions of national policy and civil preparedness. In the sections ahead, we’ll examine the technological gaps, explore proposed solutions like signal redundancy and resilient backups, and analyze how government agencies are responding to these emerging threats.
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology forms the invisible framework that supports essential services across national infrastructure. From utility operations to broadband networks and even satellite-based internet systems like Starlink, GPS provides the timing and location data that enables synchronized, real-time functionality. When this signal falters or is disrupted, the ripple effects move quickly—delays, outages, and system failures are inevitable.
Satellite communications and internet backbones rely on GPS not for positioning alone, but for synchronization. Global undersea cable networks, which transmit over 95% of intercontinental internet traffic, incorporate GPS-timed repeaters every 50 to 100 kilometers. Mismatched timing can compromise data latency and consistency, especially in high-speed trading and global communications.
Satellite internet systems such as Starlink, OneWeb, and Amazon’s Project Kuiper also integrate GPS for orbital positioning and network coordination. These networks—vital for bridging the digital divide—cannot function without tightly governed timing inputs provided by GPS signals.
Broadband networks, particularly 5G cellular and fiber-optic systems, require microsecond-level synchronization across nodes. The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) defines time synchronization standards that depend on GPS-derived Precision Time Protocol (PTP) to achieve latency below 1 millisecond. For context, misalignments of just 500 nanoseconds can degrade 5G performance, causing jitter or reduced throughput.
In energy management, GPS helps automate switchgear control, monitor frequency deviations, and coordinate energy flow across vast geographies. Utilities apply GPS data for SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems, ensuring accurate remote control of grid components. In emergency response, dispatch systems coordinate fire, medical, and police services geographically using GPS-linked CAD (Computer-Aided Dispatch) platforms. When timing or location data is inaccurate, response times increase and coordination degrades.
The web of processes that GPS sustains operates in the background—unseen, yet indispensable. Every synchronized light signal, data stream, and automated switch relies on a satellite signal traveling 20,000 kilometers to Earth and arriving in nanosecond precision. When experts say, “GPS needs additional support,” they’re pointing directly at this sprawling, interdependent ecosystem.
GPS signals, transmitted from satellites orbiting nearly 20,200 kilometers above the Earth, arrive at ground level with extremely low power—typically around -130 dBm. That makes them highly vulnerable to both jamming and spoofing. In jamming attacks, deliberately broadcast noise overpowers the legitimate GPS signal. Spoofing takes it a step further, tricking receivers by mimicking authentic signals but delivering false data.
In 2022, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) documented a sharp rise in GPS spoofing and jamming, particularly near conflict zones and international borders. In one striking event, more than 1,600 aircraft over Eastern Europe experienced navigation interference during a single 24-hour period. Civil aviation, maritime navigation, and logistics operations all suffered measurable disruptions.
Modern digital infrastructure runs through GPS like an electrical current through a circuit. Mobile networks depend on GPS time synchronization. Financial markets use it to time-stamp transactions. Power grids align their load balancing using synchronized timing pulses. Yet nearly all of this relies on a single, centralized system.
When GPS becomes unavailable, the absence of a backup cascades into delays, errors, and critical service failures. In 2016, a 13-microsecond error caused by the U.S. Air Force decommissioning an old satellite led to widespread issues—from digital TV disruptions in North America to anomalies in police and fire communication systems in multiple countries.
The GPS network includes both its constellation of satellites and the sprawling ground-based infrastructure that controls them. This includes globally distributed monitoring stations, upload facilities, and command centers. Each represents a potential entry point for a cyber breach.
In 2020, cybersecurity firm Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation warned that known GPS ground control vulnerabilities could be exploited to inject malicious data or disrupt satellite ephemeris transmission. This type of sabotage doesn't require physical access—only skill, persistence, and systemic blindness to defense gaps.
What happens when GPS fails? The answer unravels across multiple domains:
In defense scenarios, GPS outages compromise targeting accuracy, disrupt troop movement, and collapse multi-sector coordination. According to a 2021 report from the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC), a GPS denial event over a 30-day period could cause economic losses exceeding $1 billion per day in direct and indirect impacts.
The United States Global Positioning System (GPS), operated by the U.S. Space Force, provides free access to satellite-based positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) data, supporting everything from military operations to smartphone apps. However, it is not the sole system of its kind. Multiple nations have achieved orbital independence with their own fully-operational GNSS networks.
These systems are not just technical alternatives—they carry strategic weight. Countries controlling their own GNSS reduce dependency on foreign infrastructure, which can be restricted, degraded, or denied during geopolitical conflicts.
Handing over navigation capabilities to foreign-operated systems, especially in high-stakes contexts like defense or energy, introduces risk vectors that can’t be ignored. Unlike GPS, which prioritizes U.S. national interests, international systems operate under different rules of engagement, contingency protocols, and political priorities.
For instance, data access thresholds and service availability may vary under operational stress or diplomatic strain. During military conflicts or trade disputes, system operators could legally or tactically restrict access, manipulate timing signals, or introduce service degradation.
Moreover, technical nuances matter. Each GNSS has slight differences in orbital design, signal structure, and frequency usage. These aspects influence the precision, availability, and interoperability of signals, especially in hard-to-reach environments like urban canyons, forests, or polar zones.
SpaceX’s Starlink constellation, though primarily designed for broadband internet, has drawn attention as a complementary navigation and communication layer. With over 5,000 low-Earth orbit satellites already deployed and thousands more planned under FCC authorization, Starlink offers global coverage with low-latency connectivity.
This infrastructure can stabilize communications where GPS is jammed or unavailable and could serve as a timing source. However, Starlink does not currently provide dedicated PNT services. Its signals are not designed for precision geolocation, and civilian-level access is subject to commercial agreements, not standardized international conventions.
That raises questions. Can a commercial, subscription-based network be ethically and strategically relied upon for national positioning needs? What role should U.S. regulators play in leveraging or securing commercial space assets for public infrastructure resilience?
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology underpins nearly every dimension of U.S. national defense operations. From missile guidance to battlefield coordination, armed forces rely on precise timing and geolocation to function effectively. GPS signals facilitate real-time troop movements, logistics tracking, target acquisition, and encrypted communications. Without consistent access to GPS, command and control networks lose synchronization, reducing operational coordination and strategic superiority.
The Department of Defense (DoD) integrates GPS into over 30 distinct weapon systems, spanning air, land, sea, and space domains. Systems like the Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), which converts unguided bombs into precision-guided munitions, require continuous GPS signals for targeting. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as MQ-9 Reapers, operate with GPS-dependent navigation and targeting software. According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), any GPS degradation would severely disrupt mission execution across interlinked defense systems.
Beyond the battlefield, GPS availability directly shapes emergency management performance. From FEMA's disaster coordination logistics to state-level first responder deployment, agencies share a dependency on accurate GPS timestamps and geolocation. Ambulances, fire services, and police units use GPS-driven dispatch systems to reduce response times. In chaotic scenarios—wildfires, hurricanes, biohazard events—these seconds translate to lives saved or lost.
Critical infrastructure sectors—including energy, transportation, financial services, communications, and water systems—built operational frameworks around GPS-based timing and navigation. These sectors share a high degree of interconnectivity; disruption in one can cascade into others. For instance, electrical grids use GPS-based time-stamping to synchronize power flow across substations. Remove that coordination, and frequency mismatches trigger large-scale blackouts.
Cybersecurity threats compound GPS vulnerabilities. Spoofing—where attackers send false positioning data—or jamming—where signals are blocked—can silently disrupt systems at scale. State-sponsored adversaries and non-state actors have demonstrated the ability to degrade or manipulate GNSS signals, introducing uncertainty into both military and civilian networks. In an era of hybrid warfare, GPS dependencies transform from logistical enablers into potential liabilities unless backed by resilient alternatives.
GPS modernization has moved into a new phase of implementation with the addition of the L5 frequency. Designed primarily for safety-of-life applications, L5 operates at 1176.45 MHz and is transmitted by GPS Block IIF and Block III satellites. The power level and bandwidth of L5 offer improved resistance to signal degradation and better reception under tree cover or in urban canyons. According to the U.S. Space Force, 17 Block IIF and Block III satellites currently broadcast L5 signals as of mid-2024, with full global availability expected by 2027.
When combined with existing L1 and L2 signals, the L5 frequency enables triple-frequency positioning. This advancement yields increased accuracy, faster signal acquisition, and more effective mitigation of ionospheric disturbances. In practice, receivers that process all three bands experience reduced errors and more reliable performance, even in heavily compromised environments.
Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations offer a compelling alternative to enhance GPS resilience. Operating at altitudes between 500 and 2,000 kilometers, LEO satellites have lower latency and stronger signal strength due to their proximity to Earth. Providers like OneWeb, SpaceX (Starlink), and Amazon’s Project Kuiper are exploring how their constellations can serve as supplementary Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) solutions.
One clear advantage lies in the inherent orbital diversity of LEO constellations. With hundreds or even thousands of satellites positioned in constantly shifting orbits, these systems reduce the risk of total coverage disruption — a realistic concern for GPS, which relies on a limited number of MEO satellites.
Redundancy doesn't start or end in space. Terrestrial systems are gaining renewed attention as robust GPS backup solutions. Enhanced LORAN (eLORAN), a digital evolution of the decades-old long-range navigation system, delivers low-frequency timing signals that penetrate buildings, resist jamming, and cover entire continents. Britain and South Korea already deploy operational eLORAN networks, while the United States continues feasibility assessments for a national rollout.
Fiber-optic network synchronization is another tool in the redundancy arsenal. These ground-based systems transport high-precision time signals through secure, physically protected infrastructure. Resilient against spoofing and electromagnetic interference, fiber-based timing systems are already used in sectors like finance, energy, and telecommunications. Additionally, hybrid models that combine GPS with fiber timing allow failover if satellite signals degrade or drop.
Technological redundancy isn't about replacement — it's about layering. By integrating space-based systems like GPS and LEO satellites with terrestrial infrastructure such as eLORAN and fiber timing, users gain access to multi-path signal delivery. This layered architecture minimizes single points of failure, ensuring navigational continuity even if one system is compromised.
With these complementary technologies working in tandem, navigation and timing services become more robust, adaptable, and secure — even in contested or degraded environments.
The expert panel assembled under the National Timing Resilience and Security Act has delivered a clear message: passive reliance on GPS is unsustainable. While previous studies have cataloged the vulnerabilities of the U.S. GPS infrastructure, this panel emphasized the need for proactive investment and concrete action. Diversifying the national Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) architecture now ranks as a strategic priority to preserve continuity across transportation, finance, communications, and military operations.
Panel members urged executive agencies and Congress to allocate consistent and sustained federal funding for the development and deployment of complementary navigation systems. These systems must function independently of GPS. That includes eLoran (enhanced Long Range Navigation), a terrestrial navigation technology capable of delivering timing with accuracy surpassing nanoseconds, and fiber-optic distributed systems that can be integrated with critical infrastructure nodes.
The panel highlighted flexible collaboration with private sector entities, especially those already operating large low Earth orbit (LEO) constellations. SpaceX’s Starlink and Amazon’s Project Kuiper were specifically noted as platforms with the technical capability to distribute resilient timing signals across the continental U.S. and beyond. Government procurement processes should allow for agile partnerships that promote rapid deployment of scalable solutions without requiring decades-long development pipelines.
Additionally, integrating timing signal capabilities directly into commercial satellite payloads could lower costs and shorten lead times. This model aligns with the Department of Defense’s stated objective to pursue hybrid space architectures that combine civil, commercial, and military assets.
Several sectors—including power utilities and mobile telecommunications—depend heavily on synchronized time signals for operational integrity. Panelists unanimously agreed that no new infrastructure project requiring GPS-based timing for primary operation should advance without a signed-off plan for redundant timing support.
This includes:
In each case, project approval must include review for failover mechanisms, such as terrestrial timing feeds or mesh-based network fallback protocols.
"Backup" cannot be interpreted as dormant or passive. Instead, the panel defined viable systems as:
The strategy requires diversification not just in delivery mode but in operational philosophy: resilience by simultaneity, not just redundancy.
Panel members analyzed strategies used by other nations and recommended immediate evaluation and adaptation of proven models.
Each of these implementations presents case studies in prioritizing national resilience through system diversification.
The panel's consensus: The United States has the industrial base, academic expertise, and capital required to lead in backup navigation systems—so long as political commitment matches the strategic urgency.
Creating a resilient GPS framework hinges on agency-level alignment. Several federal bodies carry responsibilities that directly influence both the primary GPS infrastructure and its prospective backups.
No statute currently requires the deployment or use of alternative positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) systems. While the 2020 Executive Order 13905 instructed agencies to develop plans for resilient PNT, it did not compel the funding, deployment, or operational use of alternatives at a national scale.
This lack of compulsory legal infrastructure creates a patchwork environment marked by inconsistent incentives and voluntary compliance. Agencies often act independently, which delays cohesive action. With no single entity assigned enforcement authority, implementation remains fragmented.
The FCC’s jurisdiction over spectrum access directly affects GPS security and robustness. By allocating frequencies near the GPS L-band to commercial entities, the FCC introduces ambient noise and potential signal interference. The agency employs a risk-based assessment rather than adopting a zero-interference standard, which raises concerns among national security stakeholders.
Moreover, the absence of a coordinated policy framework between NTIA, FCC, and DHS leaves resolution mechanisms reactive rather than anticipatory. Without enforceable interoperability requirements or protection thresholds, private and public GPS users face escalating exposure.
Realignment of legislative and regulatory policies—including the creation of statutes that mandate alternative PNT infrastructure—is the essential step missing from the federal approach. Only with clearly articulated mandates and appropriated funding can national GPS resilience transition from recommendation to reality.
Backing up the Global Positioning System (GPS) carries quantifiable economic and strategic benefits. A 2019 study by RTI International, commissioned by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), estimated that a 30-day outage of GPS in the United States could cost the economy $1 billion per day in early days, with a total cost reaching $1.5 trillion over a 30-day span. These figures underscore the outsized impact of disruption on aviation, telecommunications, energy distribution, banking, and agriculture.
Implementing layered navigation support may incur short-term expenses, but it eliminates the risk of catastrophic loss in productivity and public safety. The cost of creating GPS backup systems has been projected between $50 billion and $70 billion over 15 years—meaning the investment would pay for itself if it prevented even one prolonged failure.
Maintaining sole reliance on GPS leaves transportation grids, financial systems, and emergency services exposed to single-point failures. Adding terrestrial positioning systems such as eLoran, alongside low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks, cuts that exposure sharply. Redundancy reduces the attack surface for jamming or spoofing efforts and allows continuity of service during solar storms, cyberattacks, or satellite malfunctions.
By diversifying the positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) architecture, agencies remove a systemic weakness. In turn, critical systems—like air traffic control and precision farming—gain a stronger reliability profile.
Directing federal investment into GPS-resilient technologies opens a pathway for U.S. leadership in next-generation space systems. Companies developing LEO constellations, atomic clock miniaturization, and terrestrial signal networks stand to benefit from public-private partnerships. Forward-looking projects also catalyze innovation in secure communications, quantum sensing, and AI-enhanced signal authentication.
Investing in GPS alternatives creates demand across aerospace manufacturing, advanced electronics, and broadband infrastructure. Building resilient systems requires skilled labor—engineers, technicians, project managers, and data scientists—all across regional economies. According to the Space Foundation’s 2023 report, the U.S. space economy employed 567,000 people, growing at 5.4% annually; bolstering GPS resilience will push that number further upward.
Fiber deployment, ground-based timing towers, and secure data centers double as civilian and defense assets, boosting both national capability and local development. Counties housing infrastructure benefit from ongoing maintenance contracts and tech-focused workforce training opportunities.
Where might investment generate the greatest return in your region? Consider not just the cost—think about the opportunity it creates across industries and generations.
The panel maintains a clear stance—GPS needs urgent reinforcement. Without reliable backups, the U.S. risks the functionality of tens of thousands of systems—everything from emergency dispatch to crop harvesting, financial transactions to aviation. Their recommendation isn’t speculative; it’s backed by technical assessments and real-world vulnerabilities exposed in recent years.
Federal agencies and private technology leaders must act in concert. The Department of Defense and Department of Transportation play a foundational role, but industry stakeholders—from telecom to agriculture, fintech to logistics—must also invest in alternative positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) technologies. Collaboration between sectors will drive adoption of resilient systems, prevent duplication of costly efforts, and maintain U.S. technological leadership.
Positioning GPS resilience alongside broadband access, universal internet connectivity, and next-generation cyber defenses reflects the reality of a hyperconnected world. In 2023, the National Timing Resilience and Security Act entered its implementation phase, yet Congress has not allocated permanent funding to build a terrestrial backup. That gap sends a signal—to adversaries and allies alike—about national priorities.
So what comes next?
Hundreds of millions of devices depend on GPS right now. Without deliberate, cross-sector investment in alternatives, those systems inherit a single point of failure. That risk is no longer theoretical. It's present, it's measurable, and—according to the panel—it requires action today.
©2025 American TV. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: All rights reserved. AmericanTV.com is a website for research and comparison as such, falls under "Fair Use". AmericanTV.com does not provide directly phone, TV, and internet service. All trademarks, logos, etc. remain the property of their respective owners and are used by AmericanTV.com only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. The use of any third party trademarks on this site in no way indicates any relationship between AmericanTV.com and the holders of said trademarks, nor any endorsement of AmericanTV.com by the holders of said trademarks.
We are here 24/7 to answer all of your TV + Internet Questions:
1-855-690-9884
1-855-690-9884