TV costs continue to climb, with cable subscribers now paying more than ever. Average monthly bills have surpassed the $100 mark, and a growing number of households report spending over $150 each month for traditional cable TV services alone. These figures are reshaping perceptions about media pricing as consumers question the value they receive compared to the cost.
Frustration is mounting. Families juggling household budgets are reassessing entertainment priorities, especially as streaming alternatives offer competitive content at lower prices. In this landscape, understanding where cable TV prices come from—and how they compare to other media options—is not just helpful, but necessary for consumers trying to make smart, informed decisions.
Monthly cable TV bills now exceed $100 for the average customer, with many households paying more than $150 just for television service. The pricing surge isn’t random—each dollar traces back to specific cost drivers embedded in how content is created, packaged, and delivered.
General inflation has affected nearly every industry, and television is no exception. However, the sharper rise in cable TV stems largely from the escalating costs of content licensing. Networks demand higher fees from cable providers to carry popular programming, then those increases are directly passed onto the customer. According to S&P Global Market Intelligence, average affiliate fees for cable channels have climbed nearly 30% from 2017 to 2023, with key networks asking for even steeper increases.
Live sports rights represent some of the most expensive content on television. ESPN, for instance, charges cable operators over $9 per subscriber each month—whether the customer watches it or not. Add in regional sports networks, and the cost balloons. Premium channel bundles like HBO, Showtime, and Starz further inflate the bill. Rather than offering à la carte options, providers package these channels into larger tiers, pushing customers to pay for content they might never use.
In many parts of the U.S., customers have only one or two viable cable providers. This lack of real competition removes pressure to lower prices or innovate. A 2021 FCC report found that more than 11 million U.S. households have no access to more than one broadband provider, which often doubles as the cable provider. Without alternative pricing or true substitutes, consumers are left with limited bargaining power.
Traditional cable networks rely on aging coaxial systems and set-top box hardware, which require ongoing maintenance and support. Unlike internet-based platforms that scale digitally, cable systems involve high fixed costs. Local programming, required by FCC regulations, also incurs direct costs for licensing, broadcasting rights, and regional distribution. Cable companies recoup these costs through broadcast and equipment fees, hidden charges, and higher base prices.
Every layer of content, from national networks to local channels, adds a cost line to the customer’s monthly bill. The result? A model where changes in programming and infrastructure directly dictate pricing—leaving viewers to foot an ever-growing bill.
One of the primary contributors to surging cable TV bills lies in the ever-increasing fees networks charge providers. Major broadcasters, including ESPN, Fox, and regional sports networks, demand premium carriage rates from cable companies. According to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, average network programming costs rose by over 45% between 2010 and 2020. Sports content alone accounts for more than 35% of total cable programming expenses.
These costs get passed directly to subscribers. The New York Times reported that ESPN receives more than $9 per month per subscriber, regardless of whether the customer watches sports. Multiply that by several networks and the foundational cost just to access common channels becomes a major contributor to the monthly total.
Advertised prices often fail to reflect the actual monthly outlay. Providers regularly tack on regional sports fees, broadcast TV surcharges, HD technology fees, and equipment rental charges. For example:
Data from Consumer Reports highlights that these fees can add an estimated 24% to the base cost of any cable package. A plan advertised at $99.99 could easily swell past $125 once surcharges are included.
In many markets, customers face limited or no competition when choosing a cable provider. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) found that only around 30% of U.S. households have access to more than one non-satellite cable provider. Without alternatives, consumers can’t leverage market competition to push prices down.
Cable companies capitalize on this lack of choice. They often offer promotional pricing that expires after a year, at which point customers see their bills jump by 30% or more. Even short-term discounts come with long-term costs.
The drive to bundle premium channels increases average monthly totals significantly. Services like HBO, Showtime, and Starz typically cost between $10 and $20 extra each per month. Add in packages like international channels or sports add-ons, and the charges compound easily beyond $150 monthly — just for TV service alone.
Many households opt into these add-ons assuming value, but don’t fully realize the monthly impact until their statements arrive. How many of those premium channels do you actually watch regularly?
Across the country, a quiet but decisive shift in customer behavior is reshaping how TV content gets consumed. As monthly cable TV bills surpass $100—and in many households, $150—a growing segment of viewers is walking away from traditional services. They're cutting the cord, and they’re not looking back.
The sharpest decline in cable TV viewership comes from younger demographics. According to Nielsen’s Total Audience Report, adults aged 18 to 34 spend 63% less time watching traditional TV than they did a decade ago. Instead of flipping through cable channels, this generation streams content on-demand via internet-driven platforms. Their viewing habits reflect a clear choice: flexibility and affordability win over fixed schedules and hidden fees.
Cord-cutting isn't just about canceling cable. It's a full transition in how consumers access television. Customers are swapping expensive cable bundles for digital subscriptions—Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, and others—that deliver content via broadband. They don't require coaxial cables or set-top boxes. By dropping wired TV services and relying solely on internet-based options, users reclaim control over their entertainment spending.
Between 2018 and 2023, the number of U.S. households without a traditional pay-TV subscription grew from 16 million to over 46 million, according to Leichtman Research Group. That accounts for nearly 36% of all U.S. households. In just five years, cord-cutting more than doubled, and the pace shows no signs of slowing. In 2023 alone, major cable providers lost a combined 5.9 million video customers.
Why the mass exodus? In large part, it’s a reaction to ever-increasing cable costs paired with the availability of more tailored, less expensive streaming alternatives.
This movement isn’t a passing trend. Shifts in customer behavior, driven by pricing pressures and changing lifestyles, are permanently altering how television is delivered and consumed. As streaming services continue to evolve, adapt, and diversify, traditional cable struggles to maintain relevance in a market no longer willing to overpay for generic packages.
What does your own screen time look like these days? Still flipping through cable channels—or choosing what to watch, when you want, without the sticker shock?
Subscribers to traditional cable services now pay an average of $107.30 per month for a TV package, according to a 2023 analysis by S&P Global Market Intelligence. For many, that figure climbs higher. Households with premium channels or expanded sports packages commonly surpass $150 per month — and that doesn't include broadband, which is often bundled in.
Switching to streaming alters that equation dramatically. Here's how typical standalone streaming services compare on monthly pricing:
Even a subscriber paying for four different streaming services rarely exceeds $100 monthly, and those costs come with no long-term contracts, non-cable device compatibility, and customizable lineups.
Cable's rigidity forces viewers into bloated packages. In contrast, streaming platforms let users build customized setups: skip live TV, stack ad-supported tiers, rotate subscriptions by season, or cancel anytime. For example, pairing Netflix, HBO Max with ads, and Paramount+ amounts to $32.47 per month—less than one-third the average cable bill.
Some households do opt back into cable-style OTT bundles like Hulu + Live TV or YouTube TV, but even these cap out under typical cable rates while offering modern DVR, multi-device streaming, and fewer equipment fees.
Data from Leichtman Research Group confirms this shift: as of Q3 2023, over 8.2 million U.S. households cut the cord in the previous year alone. That momentum keeps pushing streaming forward while cable legacy models hike their prices to preserve margins, not relevance.
With the average cable TV bill now exceeding $100 per month, and many households paying over $150 monthly just for traditional TV services, consumers are exploring more cost-effective alternatives that offer comparable—if not superior—value.
Several live-streaming services replicate the cable experience without requiring a long-term contract or hardware rental fees. These platforms include:
While cable traditionally bundled hundreds of channels, most viewers consistently watch only a handful. On-demand platforms allow subscribers to pay only for what they watch. These include:
About 90% of U.S. households can receive free over-the-air broadcasts using a digital antenna. ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, and PBS are often available in HD quality. The only one-time cost is the antenna itself, typically priced between $20 and $60. This option delivers news, sports, and primetime shows without a single monthly fee.
Some mobile providers—such as Verizon and T-Mobile—now offer bundled discounts that combine unlimited phone plans with streaming platform subscriptions. Verizon’s myPlan, for instance, lets customers add Disney+ or Netflix with bundled pricing, effectively trimming media costs by $5–$10 per month per service.
Switching to streaming sidesteps line-item surprises, equipment rental fees, and annual price hikes. Unlike legacy cable packages, digital alternatives frequently post pricing updates in advance, no phone call haggling required. Monthly bills become predictable—and scalable—based on actual household usage and preferences.
Average cable TV costs in the U.S. now exceed $100 per month, with many households reporting monthly bills above $150 for TV alone. In light of these mounting expenses, a growing number of viewers—spanning demographics and income levels—are scaling back or eliminating traditional cable in favor of streaming platforms.
The shift is not anecdotal; it reflects a measurable migration. According to a 2024 report by Deloitte, 48% of U.S. consumers have canceled at least one paid TV service in the past 12 months, citing cost as the top reason. At the same time, subscriptions to ad-supported or bundled streaming services have surged. Platforms like Hulu + Live TV, YouTube TV, and Sling offer competitive packages with lower average costs, typically ranging from $40 to $75 per month.
As cable providers continue increasing fees—adding regional sports charges, equipment rentals, and broadcast surcharges—the value proposition narrows. Price transparency and flexible cancellation options offered by digital services present a contrast that appeals to financially conscious consumers.
Here’s where the numbers get sharper. A report from Leichtman Research Group found that the average pay-TV subscriber pays $112.70 monthly, not including internet, and over 30% of customers pay more than $150 for TV services alone. In comparison, the median household subscribes to three streaming services, collectively costing around $48 per month, based on data from Statista in early 2024.
In effect, where one cable subscription stretches to $150 or more, a combination of live and on-demand streaming services can cover equivalent content at half the price—or less.
Are these shifts a passing trend or a lasting transformation? With cord-cutting accelerating year after year—the number of U.S. pay-TV subscribers shrank by over 5 million in 2023 alone—the outcome speaks directly to consumer intent. Households are voting with their wallets, and in doing so, they’re reshaping how televised content is consumed across the country.
Cable is losing its grip. Data from Leichtman Research Group shows that the largest cable and satellite TV providers lost about 5.9 million video subscribers in 2023 alone. Meanwhile, streaming platforms like Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video continue to see subscriber growth, fueled by lower entry prices, flexible viewing options, and original content libraries. This shift defines the current competition: a decades-old industry being overtaken by internet-based delivery.
According to Nielsen's October 2023 report, traditional television viewership—comprising broadcast and cable—now accounts for less than 50% of total TV usage in the U.S. Streaming surpassed cable in monthly share of TV viewing for the first time in July 2022, and the gap has widened with each quarter. Viewers are no longer tethered to set-top boxes or rigid programming schedules. The cord has been cut—and it’s not coming back.
The competition, however, isn't just cable versus streaming. It's cable versus broadband. As consumers migrate toward online entertainment, internet service providers (ISPs) have become central players in the television landscape. Companies like Comcast and Spectrum, originally cable giants, now offer internet bundles that quietly control access to streaming. While users ditch traditional TV, they remain reliant on the same infrastructure—controlled by the same corporations—to reach content through high-speed connections.
This shift transforms the market: ISPs are no longer just pipelines; they're gatekeepers. They influence how fast, smooth, and accessible streaming services are. In areas with limited broadband competition, consumers often end up paying steep prices just to access their new streaming alternatives.
AT&T’s former ownership of WarnerMedia and Comcast’s acquisition of NBCUniversal illustrate how telecom firms are no longer satisfied with just distributing content. They're producing it. This vertical integration blends media creation with service delivery—blurring the lines between cable and streaming while tightening corporate control over what Americans watch. The result? Media conglomerates on both sides of the cord, battling not just for market share, but for influence, data, and advertising dollars.
As the competition between cable and internet-based TV intensifies, consumers stand at the intersection—typically paying over $100 per month for traditional cable or building similarly priced streaming stacks through ISPs. Either way, the same players often end up collecting the check.
Across the board, consumers are expressing growing dissatisfaction with the state of cable TV service and pricing. According to the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) 2023 report, subscription television services posted a score of just 64 out of 100, down from 66 the previous year. This marks one of the lowest scores across all major industries tracked by the index.
In contrast, consumer satisfaction with streaming services continues to climb, averaging 76 out of 100, highlighting a widening gap in perceived value. The ACSI data points to the conclusion that conventional cable services are failing to meet evolving customer expectations, particularly in price transparency and content delivery.
Net Promoter Score (NPS), a widely used benchmarking metric based on the likelihood of a customer recommending a service, has dropped significantly for top cable providers. As of early 2024:
For context, a positive NPS above zero indicates more brand promoters than detractors. These negative scores signal a widespread disconnect between what consumers pay and what they perceive as valuable return.
Real customer voices highlight the disconnect more vividly than any data set. One Maryland-based subscriber shared, “I pay over $150 a month just for TV, and half the time the signal drops when it rains. I’m not getting what I paid for.” Another from Nevada noted, “I cut the cord after my ‘$89.99 bundle’ jumped to $164 with taxes and fees. Never again.”
These first-person accounts underscore the prevailing sentiment: the gap between perceived value and paid cost has widened enough to drive growing numbers toward alternative viewing options—most of them cheaper, more customizable, and more transparent.
Before making changes, get a clear picture of exactly what you're paying for. Itemize your monthly bill and identify each line item: base cost, equipment fees, taxes, regional sports surcharges, and premium channel add-ons. Many users discover they're paying for services they never use or even requested. If you don’t watch high-definition sports or rarely tune into movie channels, those fees add up fast. Strip it down to the essentials. This action alone can reduce your cost by $20 to $40 per month, depending on package size and provider.
HBO, Showtime, Starz, and similar premium channels often add $10 to $15 each to your monthly bill. For a household subscribed to four or more, that’s more than $600 per year just for premium content. If these channels aren’t central to your regular viewing, cutting them delivers immediate savings. Most streaming services offer similar programming at lower rates, or even on-demand rental options without forcing monthly commitments.
Contacting customer retention teams still works. Cable companies have targeted retention budgets specifically allocated to prevent you from canceling. Inform the agent that you're ready to cancel unless they offer a lower monthly rate or streamline your package. Many customers receive temporary promotional pricing or unadvertised loyalty discounts through this approach. Expect savings ranging from $25 to $60 per month, depending on your negotiation leverage and length of service.
Switching fully to streaming services like Hulu + Live TV, YouTube TV, or Sling can cut your bill substantially. The average cost of a full-featured live TV streaming package with sports and news sits between $70 and $85/month—already lower than the average cable bill, which now exceeds $100, and often goes well beyond $150 for households with multiple add-ons.
If you're reluctant to part completely with cable, try a hybrid plan—combine minimal cable with just one or two streaming services. That model blends live TV with flexible on-demand programming, often shaving $40 or more off traditional bundles.
The FCC mandates major broadcast networks—ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, PBS—be available over-the-air for free. A simple digital antenna, costing $30 to $70 with no subscription fees, unlocks high-definition access to local news, sports, and network content. For viewers who primarily tune into national networks, this strategy replaces cable entirely for a one-time investment.
Many providers now offer standalone high-speed internet without bundling TV, something they previously discouraged. Compare pricing and speeds. Often, a $60 to $80 internet-only plan, paired with streaming apps, beats the cost of a full cable bundle—especially once you subtract equipment rental fees and set-top box charges that inflate traditional service costs.
TV viewing habits evolve, but bills tend to stay the same unless challenged. Every few months, revisit your subscription choices and total monthly spending. Eliminate anything unused. Streamline for efficiency. Combine strategies to lower costs while maintaining access to the programming you actually watch.
Average cable TV bills have surged past the $100 mark, with many households now paying over $150 each month just for traditional television service. Those numbers don’t reflect luxury or excess—they're the new norm. And behind those totals lie hidden fees, equipment charges, and premium bundles that often bundle less value than promised.
But the market offers clear, accessible alternatives. Internet-based TV and streaming services have evolved from niche platforms into mainstream staples. Monthly subscriptions, many under $20–$60, make these services financially attractive compared to bloated cable packages. Hundreds of channels replaced by targeted, on-demand options. It’s not just a preference change—it’s a financial shift driven by consumers unwilling to pay more for less.
People are speaking with their wallets. When surveyed, a growing percentage report dropping cable specifically due to cost concerns. And the math supports their move—cutting cable in favor of select streaming platforms can slash TV bills by more than half without sacrificing content variety or quality.
Already considering a switch? Use the tools below to take action:
Consumers no longer need to accept rising bills without a fight. With clarity, planning, and the right internet-based subscriptions, users can dictate not only what content they watch—but what price they’re willing to pay. Have you made the switch? Or are you still wrestling with that monthly bill? Share your experience, your strategies, or your frustrations in the comments below.
©2025 American TV. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: All rights reserved. AmericanTV.com is a website for research and comparison as such, falls under "Fair Use". AmericanTV.com does not provide directly phone, TV, and internet service. All trademarks, logos, etc. remain the property of their respective owners and are used by AmericanTV.com only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. The use of any third party trademarks on this site in no way indicates any relationship between AmericanTV.com and the holders of said trademarks, nor any endorsement of AmericanTV.com by the holders of said trademarks.
We are here 24/7 to answer all of your TV + Internet Questions:
1-855-690-9884
1-855-690-9884