As the largest local television broadcaster in the United States, Nexstar Media Group controls a powerful portfolio of over 200 stations across nearly every major market. With strategic ownership stakes in The CW and a commanding presence across ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC affiliates, Nexstar's influence spans coast to coast. Now, the company is pursuing its most ambitious expansion yet—a proposed acquisition of Tegna Inc., a move that could redefine the balance of power in American broadcast media.
This week, Tegna shareholders cast their votes on Nexstar’s high-profile proposal to acquire the company’s vast network of TV stations and digital assets. The vote signals a pivotal moment for the long-anticipated deal, which aims to bring dozens of additional local affiliates under Nexstar’s operational umbrella. If finalized, the acquisition locks in a major shift in the competitive landscape, potentially placing Nexstar in an even stronger position to shape the future of TV affiliations for ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC.
How could this realignment affect programming, advertising power, and regional news coverage? The implications stretch far beyond corporate boardrooms.
Nexstar’s pursuit of Tegna unfolded through a complex buyout framework involving both cash and equity. The acquisition proposal values Tegna at approximately $8.6 billion, including the assumption of debt. Structurally, the transaction is designed as an all-cash deal backed by a combination of Nexstar’s balance sheet strength and third-party financing partners — replicating the leverage model used successfully in its 2019 acquisition of Tribune Media.
Private equity involvement plays a central role. Standard General, a key investor in local broadcast space, proposed to take a controlling stake in Tegna through the transaction, while Apollo Global Management would participate primarily through financing arrangements. This consortium structure signals a hybrid ownership strategy with Nexstar positioned to integrate key station assets and operational control under its umbrella.
The Tegna portfolio includes 64 television stations spread across 51 markets, reaching approximately 39% of U.S. television households — a footprint that significantly reshapes Nexstar’s national leverage. The portfolio spans all four major networks:
Many of these stations dominate midsized markets where local news still commands significant viewership. Strategic locations like Atlanta (WXIA – NBC) and Washington, D.C. (WUSA – CBS) give Nexstar a stronger grip on politically influential and advertising-rich regions.
Local television remains one of the few spaces delivering consistent ratings in live content. Nexstar understands this leverage and has focused the acquisition not just on general programming, but also on sports — one of the last bastions of appointment viewing. The inclusion of assets under Tegna’s “Sports 22” brand offers a foothold in regional sports broadcasting, especially in markets underserved by national sports networks.
Tegna’s existing relationships with sports franchises and rights holders, particularly in mid-sized cities, equip Nexstar to develop hyper-local sports content. This aligns with its vision for targeted advertising and cross-platform distribution — TV, digital, and streaming. By incorporating these assets, Nexstar positions itself to compete with both traditional networks and emerging sports streamers.
On May 15, 2024, shareholders of Tegna Inc. cast a decisive vote that accelerated Nexstar’s expansion plan—approving the $8.6 billion proposed acquisition of Tegna’s portfolio, including local TV stations affiliated with ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC. With an approval rate exceeding 72% of the outstanding shares, the vote sent an uncompromising message: institutional and retail investors shared Nexstar’s strategic vision for redefining the landscape of American broadcast media.
Almost immediately after the vote, media sector stocks reacted. Tegna’s shares closed up 5.7% on the day of the announcement, while Nexstar’s saw a more modest 1.2% gain—read by analysts as confidence in execution rather than speculative frenzy. Trading volume surged above 10 million shares for Tegna, triple the daily average.
Regulators and media watchdogs issued initial comments without formal objection. The FCC confirmed reception of preliminary filings and stated that review scheduling was underway. Meanwhile, competing broadcasters, including Hearst Television and Sinclair Broadcast Group, issued neutral corporate statements while reportedly increasing lobbying activity in Washington.
What does this strong shareholder endorsement signal? First, capital markets clearly see value in scale-based consolidations. In a sector where traditional advertising revenue is flatlining and direct-to-consumer streaming demands structural overhauls, combining station groups is not just tolerated—it’s encouraged.
Second, institutional investors appear aligned with Nexstar’s thesis: that controlling more local affiliates across multiple networks enhances not only negotiating power with distributors and advertisers but also content leverage across digital and broadcast channels. This shareholder greenlight reflects a broader acceptance of the premise that consolidation isn’t a defensive posture anymore—it’s a strategic catalyst.
Rather than hinting at mere buyer enthusiasm, this vote cemented the merger’s legitimacy beyond the boardrooms. It created a public record of institutional commitment—an asset Nexstar can now leverage as it moves into regulatory and strategic execution phases.
Network affiliates act as local broadcasters that partner with national television networks—such as ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC—to distribute content within regional markets. These agreements allow local stations to air network primetime programming, national news, and sports, while also maintaining autonomy to produce and broadcast local content including news, weather, and public affairs.
Affiliation agreements typically last 3 to 5 years and determine not just content flow but also revenue shares from advertising. These partnerships form the backbone of broadcast television’s reach, enabling networks to maintain a presence across all 210 Designated Market Areas (DMAs) in the United States without owning every local station outright.
Tegna’s portfolio includes 64 television stations across 51 markets, serving approximately 39% of U.S. television households. Many of these stations are affiliated with major networks: 13 with CBS, 11 with NBC, 6 with ABC, and 6 with FOX. The acquisition would expand Nexstar’s control into mid-sized markets such as Norfolk, Jacksonville, and New Orleans—key territories currently outside its direct ownership footprint.
By absorbing Tegna’s affiliate stations, Nexstar would enhance vertical alignment between content distribution and advertising sales. In local markets where Nexstar already operates, layering on another network affiliate enables it to optimize resources—shared studios, common technical infrastructure, and regional advertising packages—leading to cost efficiencies and stronger negotiating power with national networks.
Moreover, Nexstar would gain leverage in network contract negotiations. With a larger number of valuable affiliates under its belt, the company can influence retransmission consent fees and affiliate compensation terms. Networks tend to prioritize distributors with wider reach, and an expanded Nexstar would command significant weight in those conversations.
The acquisition also shifts the competitive dynamics among major local TV station groups. Before the proposed deal, key players included Sinclair Broadcast Group, Gray Television, Hearst Television, and Scripps. Each holds a strategic mix of network affiliations across various markets. Nexstar, already the nation’s largest local television operator by portfolio size, would further widen the gap post-acquisition in terms of market penetration and revenue potential.
If Nexstar finalizes the Tegna acquisition, competitors will face a recalibrated playing field. Network partners may reassess their affiliate strategies, and regional advertisers could consolidate spending toward station groups offering multi-market coverage under a single umbrella. This shift doesn’t just alter balance sheets—it recasts the core power structure of American broadcast media.
Over the past decade, the U.S. broadcast television industry has undergone dramatic consolidation. A wave of mergers and acquisitions has restructured ownership across both national networks and local affiliates. In 2004, the top 10 local station owners controlled roughly 24% of all full-power local TV stations. By 2022, that figure more than doubled to nearly 51%, according to data from the Pew Research Center.
This consolidation isn’t confined to local markets. At the national level, major groups like Nexstar Media Group, Sinclair Broadcast Group, and Gray Television have acquired dozens of stations spanning multiple markets and time zones. Nexstar’s 2019 acquisition of Tribune Media catapulted it to become the largest local TV station operator in the country. Deals like the proposed Tegna acquisition follow the same trajectory—amplifying reach while centralizing decision-making.
Cable television companies once shaped distribution and access for broadcasters. That dynamic has changed. Today, while cable still delivers much of the country’s linear television consumption, its dominance is eroding. According to Leichtman Research Group, major U.S. cable operators lost over 5.9 million video subscribers in 2023 alone. As cord-cutting accelerates and digital streaming overtakes traditional viewing habits, broadcast groups are repositioning themselves. Many aim to strengthen control not only over content production but also over direct-to-consumer platforms—ensuring profitability even as carriage fees decline.
This shift places broadcast conglomerates in a dual role as both content creators and distribution gatekeepers. Companies like Nexstar now operate streaming channels like NewsNation alongside their legacy affiliations, reducing reliance on cable operators to reach audiences. Consolidation supports this pivot through scale, giving owners greater control over programming schedules, syndication rights, and multi-platform ad sales.
The effects of media concentration reverberate through local journalism and advertising ecosystems. Fewer owners mean streamlined operations, but also less editorial diversity. According to the Knight Foundation, nearly 20% of all local news stations in consolidated markets reduced unique local content in favor of regional or nationally-produced segments. This approach boosts efficiency but often sidelines community-focused reporting and investigative efforts.
Consolidation also narrows the field for local advertisers. With fewer station groups dominating market share, ad rates become less competitive and increasingly centralized through national buying systems. While that simplifies the media planning process for large agencies, it complicates local outreach strategies for small businesses.
Competition—long a hallmark of U.S. broadcast markets—shifts in tone under consolidation. Instead of network-versus-network rivalries within individual markets, large groups manage clusters of stations and orchestrate coverage to minimize overlap. Operational synergies arise, but at the cost of diminished pluralism in broadcast voices. As Nexstar expands its empire, the implications of this ownership model continue to unfold across America’s airwaves.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates how much of the media landscape a single entity can control, and Nexstar’s expansion triggers a direct confrontation with those limits. Current FCC rules put a national ownership cap at 39% of total U.S. TV households, though networks can game this figure through the UHF discount—counting UHF station audiences at just 50% toward the cap. Nexstar already leverages this mechanism to stay within bounds, but a Tegna acquisition threatens to push it to the edge—or beyond.
In addition to the national cap, the Local Television Ownership Rule prevents a single company from owning more than two stations in one market, and only under certain conditions. These restrictions become especially relevant in cities where Nexstar and Tegna both operate major affiliates. Any overlap in big-four affiliates—ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX—launches red flags under these rules. Markets like Dallas, Indianapolis, or San Diego, for example, will likely determine whether the deal can proceed as planned or requires drastic adjustments.
If the merger folds Tegna’s 64 local stations into Nexstar’s portfolio, the combined entity could control two—sometimes even three—network affiliates in the same DMA (designated market area). FCC policy prohibits this unless at least one station is not among the top four by audience share, and unless at least eight independently owned television voices remain in the market. That combination rarely aligns. In practice, this means potential forced divestitures or license swaps in overlapping zones.
In markets where these conflicts exist, Nexstar must either seek waivers—which the FCC rarely grants—or spin off stations. Strategic selloffs to politically neutral or minority-owned entities could counterbalance concerns, but each sale dilutes the merger’s original synergy ambitions.
Beyond technical ownership caps, the FCC applies a broad public interest standard when reviewing license transfers. This invites lobbying from numerous quarters—consumer advocacy groups, competitors, labor unions, even local governments. Opponents could raise concerns about reduced diversity of viewpoints, diminished local news output, or weakened editorial independence.
In recent cases, such as Sinclair's failed merger with Tribune in 2018, the FCC has demonstrated willingness to block deals over such issues. The public interest clause serves as both a political and procedural hurdle. To clear it, Nexstar may need to promise community investment, commit to independent editorial boards, or agree to broadcast certain local content thresholds in underserved regions.
Ultimately, regulatory navigation now becomes the central theatre of Nexstar’s expansion play. Each approval step will test not just policy compliance, but the company’s ability to shape public perception and political consensus in its favor.
Over the past decade, Nexstar Media Group has outpaced its peers in building a robust local news apparatus. With this acquisition of Tegna, the company will deepen its local footprint across existing and newly added markets. Nexstar already produces more local programming hours than any other U.S. television broadcaster, averaging over 283,000 hours annually across its stations. Integrating Tegna's 64 TV stations boosts both reach and newsroom capacity—a move designed to consolidate control over regional news ecosystems and elevate profitability in specific DMAs (Designated Market Areas).
Nexstar’s $160 million digital transformation campaign, launched in 2021, laid the groundwork. The acquisition allows direct deployment of these digital infrastructure upgrades into Tegna’s portfolio. Station websites, streaming apps, and mobile platforms will see streamlined content management systems and programmatic advertising tools. This will expand advertising inventory while enhancing localized audience targeting. Ad revenue per user is expected to rise, especially in medium-sized markets where competition for digital ad dollars remains underdeveloped.
This deal unlocks opportunities for tighter alignment between local TV stations and Nexstar’s cable news network, NewsNation. Coordinated editorial strategies will enable local journalists to source and relay stories to the national desk faster, creating a networked channel of regional feeder stories. For NewsNation, this means improved access to ground-level reporting and exclusives, while for local affiliates, it opens distribution pipelines to a national audience, increasing visibility and credibility.
In cities where both Nexstar and Tegna already operate, the integration will foster newsroom collaboration, not redundancy. This strategic layering enables better beat specialization, joint investigative units, and elongated news coverage cycles. Where once a regional story died after the 10 PM newscast, it now has shelf life across VOD platforms, streamers, and national channels.
The acquisition’s real-time implication? Nexstar will not only control more channels—it will control more narratives. And in the business of television news, that equates to influence, audience loyalty, and scalable revenue models.
Shareholders hold decisive power in major media mergers by approving or rejecting proposals that redefine corporate trajectories. In the Tegna-Nexstar context, the shareholder vote signaled confidence not only in the strategic synergy but also in the leadership’s valuation and diligence. According to Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), shareholders in the U.S. approved over 98% of M&A transactions that came to a vote in 2023, underscoring how integral their role is in consolidation strategies.
Momentum builds or disintegrates based on the shareholder vote. Passive investors often follow recommendations from proxy advisors like ISS or Glass Lewis, making those endorsements pivotal to the board's approach. In Nexstar’s case, a favorable vote allowed the deal to move forward into regulatory review, effectively transforming theoretical ambitions into actionable steps.
Media companies engaging in mergers at this scale follow precise protocols—board-level oversight, special committees for conflict resolution, and third-party valuations are standard. Large-scale transactions require the engagement of external legal, financial, and strategic advisors to verify underlying assets and future liabilities.
Failure to adhere to these standards exposes firms to shareholder lawsuits, SEC investigations, or deal collapses. For instance, Sinclair Broadcast Group’s failed bid for Tribune Media in 2018 unraveled amid regulatory objections and governance concerns.
Market-facing communication during mergers must operate under strict SEC guidelines. Nexstar, like its peers, files Form 8-K filings to disclose material developments, publishes proxy statements ahead of votes, and holds analyst calls to address investor queries. These mechanisms ensure equal access to information across institutional and retail investors.
Compliance with Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) ensures that no investor receives material information before others. Violations can lead to enforcement actions, as seen in the 2020 case between the SEC and the CEO of a major telecom firm, where selective disclosure led to penalties and barred individual practices.
In a media landscape defined by rapid shifts and intense scrutiny, robust governance is not merely advisable—it dictates merger success or failure. Through board oversight, stringent disclosures, and active shareholder participation, entities like Nexstar maintain institutional legitimacy while reshaping the nation’s broadcast map.
The shareholder green light on Nexstar Media Group's bid to absorb key ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC affiliates from Tegna marks a definitive push toward an era of intensifying broadcast consolidation. Nexstar, already the nation’s largest local television operator, will control stations reaching over 70% of U.S. households. This unprecedented footprint empowers the company to influence everything from retransmission fees to prime-time content curation strategies.
More than a business expansion, this acquisition recalibrates the U.S. television ecosystem. With each megadeal—Tribune in 2019, Media General in 2017, and now Tegna in 2024—Nexstar shifts the traditional balance between networks and affiliates. It no longer just distributes; it steers. This control translates into greater leverage in negotiations with major networks and streaming partners alike, shaping the kind of programming millions see every evening.
By 2029, the local TV landscape will no longer resemble the fragmented fabric of just a decade prior. Expect consolidation to narrow operational differences between local stations. Branding, advertising packages, even graphics packages—these will look more uniform across major regional stations owned by giant parent firms. In that environment, smaller broadcasters won’t compete on scale; they’ll differentiate through hyperlocal content or niche digital verticals.
National television trends will follow suit. Afternoon news blocks may become testing grounds for syndication pilots. Late night slots could shift toward streaming simulcasts. Linear TV isn’t disappearing, but its economic logic will increasingly mirror that of digital: more data, tighter targeting, and rapid response to viewer behavior.
Network affiliations will remain fluid. Local markets will likely see more cross-network deals, especially in areas where station groups own affiliates for more than one of the Big Four networks. News deserts could appear in areas where smaller stations can’t keep up with rising ownership costs or content licensing fees.
Every merger invites the same questions: Who gets heard? Who gets ignored? Nexstar’s rise places these questions squarely within the jurisdiction of the FCC, whose media ownership rules frame the borders of modern TV influence. In practice, tighter ownership means fewer editorial viewpoints. In large markets, this consolidation might homogenize coverage; in smaller DMAs, it could deliver vital investments in infrastructure and staffing.
Advocates of localism in journalism face a paradox. Larger corporate owners have the capital to expand reporting teams—and the incentive to streamline editorial lines across markets. Watchdogs will monitor whether station-level editorial control remains decentralized, or whether content directives pulse down from national headquarters.
How does this affect access? Regulatory oversight must now grapple with broadband distribution, social video platforms, and digital-first newsrooms. The FCC’s current template still leans on rules shaped for a 20th-century media environment. Nexstar’s acquisition places pressure on national regulators to modernize both metrics and mechanisms of control.
©2025 American TV. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: All rights reserved. AmericanTV.com is a website for research and comparison as such, falls under "Fair Use". AmericanTV.com does not provide directly phone, TV, and internet service. All trademarks, logos, etc. remain the property of their respective owners and are used by AmericanTV.com only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. The use of any third party trademarks on this site in no way indicates any relationship between AmericanTV.com and the holders of said trademarks, nor any endorsement of AmericanTV.com by the holders of said trademarks.
We are here 24/7 to answer all of your TV + Internet Questions:
1-855-690-9884
1-855-690-9884