In a significant shift affecting sports media and fan access, ESPN will not be able to stream in-market Major League Baseball games through at least 2027. This development stems from existing regional broadcasting agreements, which grant local networks exclusive rights to in-market streaming—a structure that remains firmly in place despite the rising demand for on-the-go digital viewing.
With streaming now the primary mode of content consumption for many sports fans, the inability of a national powerhouse like ESPN to offer in-market MLB coverage represents a deepening disconnect between fan preferences and broadcasting rights frameworks. Viewers increasingly expect fluid, platform-agnostic access to live games. Instead, regional sports networks (RSNs) retain a stronghold, prioritizing their own carriage agreements.
This stalemate underscores one of the longest-running realities in professional sports media: broadcast rights evolve slower than audience behavior. As traditional TV models fade and mobile-first habits dominate, MLB and its partners face mounting pressure to adapt. ESPN's current limitation isn’t just a rights issue—it’s a mirror reflecting where baseball’s media strategy still lags behind its audience.
Media rights define who has the legal authority to distribute sports content and in what format. In the context of Major League Baseball (MLB), these rights determine which networks and platforms can broadcast games—nationally, regionally, or digitally. MLB negotiates these rights in multi-year contracts that can span broadcast television, cable, and digital streaming.
Networks submit competitive bids for the rights to show games, factoring in viewership demand, advertising value, and potential subscriber growth. Once MLB reaches an agreement, only the rights holder can broadcast the games covered under that contract. These deals typically involve complex terms covering live game footage, highlight usage, streaming rights, and geographic exclusivity.
MLB’s broadcasting framework hinges on a split: national rights belong to companies like ESPN, Fox, and TBS, while regional rights remain controlled by individual teams through Regional Sports Networks (RSNs). This dual system means multiple broadcasters can carry MLB content, but not the same games in the same market at the same time.
This structure ensures that a Yankees fan watching from New York sees a different set of available broadcasts than a Padres fan in San Diego. The team’s home RSN typically holds stronger control than national broadcasters when game times overlap.
MLB was one of the earliest professional leagues to capitalize on television. The first national broadcast contract came in 1953 with ABC’s “Game of the Week.” Since then, the value of media rights has surged. In 2021, MLB’s total broadcast and media rights generated a reported $3.66 billion in revenue, according to Forbes. These revenues accounted for over half of the league's total income.
ESPN, in particular, has maintained a long-standing relationship with MLB. Its first major agreement with the league began in 1990 and has evolved through successive negotiations. The most recent deal, struck in 2021, extends through 2028 and is valued at $550 million annually. Yet even with that significant investment, the deal restricts ESPN’s access to certain game categories—especially in-market regular-season broadcasts, which remain under RSN control.
As a result, media rights and their historical structures continue to determine not just who gets to broadcast the games, but also how fans experience America’s pastime at home and online.
MLB’s national media blueprint rests on a network of multibillion-dollar partnerships with ESPN, FOX, TBS, Apple TV+, and Peacock. Each partner buys rights to a specific slice of the game-day calendar, with varying degrees of exclusivity and access. These deals provide consistent national exposure while also driving significant revenue to the league's central office.
ESPN and MLB agreed to a new rights package beginning in 2022 worth $550 million annually, running through the 2028 season. The contract significantly restructured ESPN’s role. Previously, ESPN had rights to weeknight games—including Monday and Wednesday slates—but dropped those in favor of a streamlined focus on marquee events.
This new deal includes:
By reducing the number of games in favor of higher-profile time slots, ESPN shifted strategy. The network now prioritizes prime matchups with national relevance rather than volume. That choice affects not only scheduling but also how it structures its broadcast teams, studio coverage, and promotional support.
Broadcast exclusivity commands premium dollars. FOX signed a deal in 2018 worth $5.1 billion over seven years, locking in the company’s position as the destination for baseball’s biggest stage. Apple TV+ pays roughly $85 million per year for its Friday night doubleheaders. Peacock follows with an annual deal reportedly worth $30 million, buying into early-day broadcasting real estate not typically utilized by traditional networks.
This trend reflects an emerging consensus: quantity matters less than visibility. Networks now compete for game windows that deliver guaranteed national audiences, postseason access, or unique scheduling (like Sunday brunch broadcasts or tie-ins with youth events). As a result, MLB’s media revenues have steadily increased despite fewer national games in total.
National networks avoid low-profile matchups. ESPN in particular uses Sunday Night Baseball to deliver a spotlight on teams with large fan bases, rising stars, or historical rivalries. The Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers, Cubs, and Cardinals dominate these broadcasts. Games featuring hyped rookies or divisional showdowns also attract attention.
This selective strategy aligns with ratings trends. According to Nielsen, Sunday Night Baseball averaged 1.56 million viewers per game in 2023, outperforming weeknight games from previous years. Networks use analytics, local market trends, and potential playoff impact to program their slots. The result: a curated television product with broad national pull, even if it sacrifices small-market representation along the way.
Despite its expansive digital presence, ESPN lacks the rights to stream in-market Major League Baseball (MLB) games—and this restriction will remain in place until at least 2027. The limitation isn't due to technology or reach; it’s the direct result of broadcast rights hierarchies entrenched in contracts with Regional Sports Networks (RSNs).
Each MLB team signs local broadcasting deals with RSNs, such as Bally Sports, YES Network, or NBC Sports regional affiliates. These contracts grant exclusive in-market rights, effectively locking national broadcasters like ESPN out of streaming live local games to viewers located within that team’s designated home television territory. As of 2023, these RSNs collectively controlled the vast majority of local game broadcasts—around 78% of all MLB games aired regionally, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.
This exclusivity means that even if ESPN carries a nationally televised game, it must black out the stream in the team’s home market unless specified otherwise by contract. The RSNs expect local viewers to use their platforms, either via cable or their own streaming apps, preserving their ad inventory and distribution revenue.
ESPN's current MLB media rights agreement, extended in 2021 for $550 million per year over seven years, does not include in-market streaming rights. That omission wasn’t accidental—it reflects the enduring power of RSNs in dictating local market access. Renegotiating this arrangement requires either the expiration or the restructuring of the RSN contracts that extend beyond ESPN’s current deal lifespan.
Altering these agreements mid-course would trigger complex legal disputes. Each RSN contract contains non-compete and protection clauses designed to preserve territorial exclusivity. Adjusting one contract often necessitates renegotiating several more, creating a domino effect that media lawyers and league executives routinely avoid due to cost, process delays, and existing revenue guarantees.
Until existing RSN deals are restructured industry-wide or phased out, ESPN remains boxed out from streaming live in-market baseball—no matter how much demand or digital bandwidth it holds.
The distinction between in-market and out-of-market MLB games comes down to where a fan is located in relation to the team they want to watch.
This geographic segmentation isn't arbitrary. Major League Baseball assigns specific territories to every team. These assignments govern the distribution of live game broadcasts, often giving Regional Sports Networks (RSNs) exclusive rights to in-market games.
MLB.TV offers comprehensive access to out-of-market games, broadcasting every matchup not subject to local or national blackout restrictions. However, fans trying to stream their local team’s games using the same platform will encounter roadblocks. That’s where blackout rules come into play.
These blackouts aren’t about encouraging stadium attendance—they exist because RSNs pay for exclusive local rights. As a result, a subscriber in San Diego can’t stream Padres games live via MLB.TV, even with a paid subscription, because those rights belong to Bally Sports San Diego.
Take fans of the Oakland Athletics in Oakland or San José. Even though MLB.TV promises “every team, every game,” fans in these cities won’t be able to stream A’s home games live. They sit squarely inside the A's designated in-market territory. NBC Sports California holds the rights locally, cutting off digital access through national platforms.
Now imagine a fan just 100 miles away in Sacramento. Though still in Northern California, Sacramento may fall outside the blackout zone depending on zip code. That fan could tune in via MLB.TV without interference. The difference isn’t about fandom or fairness—it's a contractually enforced boundary line.
Want to find out which games are blacked out in your location? Entering a zip code into the MLB.TV Blackout Finder reveals exact limitations. The discrepancies, sometimes down to the neighborhood level, highlight just how fragmented access remains in the current media landscape.
Regional Sports Networks (RSNs) emerged in the 1980s and 1990s to deliver hometown coverage of professional sports directly to local fan bases. These networks forged exclusive relationships with individual franchises, packaging televised games with commentary, pre-game coverage, and regionally relevant advertising. RSNs didn’t just televise games—they built a powerful bridge between teams and their communities, tailoring the viewing experience to a specific market’s fan culture.
For Major League Baseball, RSNs became deeply embedded in team economics. Local broadcast rights now comprise a significant portion of annual revenues for many clubs. In 2022, Forbes reported that local TV deals accounted for over 25% of the average MLB team's income. Without RSNs, teams can't replicate the same consistent local exposure or monetization.
Because RSNs pay teams for exclusive rights to air games within specified geographic zones, they also influence who can stream what and where. These contracts prevent national broadcasters like ESPN from streaming in-market games unless they share rights or receive waivers—deals rarely granted. As a result, live streaming from ESPN in a team's home market remains restricted, regardless of fan demand or service capability.
This tangled web of rights leads directly to blackouts. A fan in New York subscribing to ESPN+ can't stream Yankees games if YES Network holds regional rights, even if ESPN owns the national broadcast. RSNs define territorial control, and their grip extends directly into streaming policy.
The RSN model began to wobble in early 2023, when Diamond Sports Group—operator of Bally Sports networks and owner of rights for 14 MLB teams—filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The ripple effects were immediate. Teams like the Arizona Diamondbacks and San Diego Padres faced disruptions in local broadcasts after Bally stopped payments.
MLB stepped in directly, managing production and distribution through its digital platforms and local partners. This shift marked a turning point. Regional control, once sequestered to long-standing TV deals, began to fracture. Teams saw firsthand the financial risk of relying so heavily on a single RSN entity.
In parallel, uncertainty around Diamond’s future raised doubts for teams and advertisers. Contracts that once promised stability turned into liabilities. With Bally Sports on the verge of losing more affiliates, questions now center on how much longer the RSN model can realistically support modern sports consumption habits.
The instability gripping RSNs mirrors another problem—declining viewership. Nielsen data from 2023 showed double-digit ratings drops for numerous RSNs compared to the previous season. Factors ranged from cord-cutting trends to younger audiences choosing highlights over full broadcasts. As subscribers evaporate, advertising revenue and carriage fees follow suit.
With less reach and fewer guarantees, RSNs no longer offer the economic security they once did. Teams locked into long-term contracts face dwindling returns, while fans see more blackouts and fewer options. The collapse of Diamond Sports may accelerate MLB’s pivot to centralizing rights, especially as the league explores market-wide streaming solutions post-2027.
Blackout rules in Major League Baseball aren’t a technical glitch or a regulatory oversight—these rules are built into the foundation of the league’s media structure. They exist to guard the interests of Regional Sports Networks (RSNs), which pay substantial sums for exclusive rights to broadcast games within specific markets. By ensuring that in-market games are only available through these regional networks, MLB preserves the value of those deals.
Consider this: if a fan living in Chicago could stream every White Sox game on ESPN+, regardless of location, Comcast SportsNet Chicago—who paid millions for local rights—would see subscriber value drop sharply. Local broadcasters count on exclusivity to drive advertising revenue and justify carriage fees to cable providers. Without blackout protections, RSNs wouldn’t pay the same premiums, and MLB’s media revenues would take a direct hit.
From a fan perspective, though, blackout rules don’t protect—they restrict. They create a fractured ecosystem in which your physical location can block your ability to watch your own team play. No other major form of entertainment—streaming movies, TV series, or even international sports—is as geographically restricted in the digital age as Major League Baseball.
When fans subscribe to a streaming service like ESPN+ expecting comprehensive coverage, only to find they can't watch their local team's games, the result is disappointment and confusion. This dynamic alienates viewers and drives them toward illegal streams or complete disengagement. The league loses fan goodwill, and streaming services take the blame for a system they don’t control.
Imagine a fan living just outside of Oakland who subscribes to ESPN+ to follow the Athletics. The night arrives. The A’s are facing off against the Angels, and the game is available nationally on ESPN+. Except… not for that fan.
Because they’re in-market, blackout restrictions kick in. Even though the game is broadcast on ESPN—with ESPN+'s full rights—stream access is blocked locally. The fan needs a subscription to NBC Sports California, accessible only through a traditional cable package or select digital providers. And if they’ve already cut the cord? They’re out of luck.
This is not a quirky one-time issue—it happens every day of the MLB season, in cities and suburbs across the country. Fans pay for access and end up locked out. Until 2027, when league-wide rights may finally shift, blackout restrictions will continue to define the limits of fan access. The screen might say “Available on ESPN+,” but location still decides the outcome.
Digital streaming platforms have redefined how fans consume baseball. ESPN+, Peacock, Apple TV+, and MLB.TV now stream live games, studio shows, and original programming to millions of subscribers, often with exclusive rights that bypass traditional cable channels. In 2022, Apple TV+ struck a deal with MLB for exclusive Friday Night Baseball broadcasts, and NBC’s Peacock secured a Sunday morning time slot. These moves signaled a decisive pivot away from linear TV toward app-based experiences.
MLB.TV, in particular, demonstrates the breadth of demand. According to MLB, viewership on the app surged in 2023, delivering more than 12.7 billion minutes streamed across the season. That number represents a 9% increase over the 2022 total—a record at the time—highlighting a robust streaming appetite despite blackout restrictions still in place.
Cord-cutting continues to accelerate. According to Leichtman Research Group, only 66% of U.S. households had a traditional pay-TV subscription as of 2023, a sharp drop from 85% in 2018. Meanwhile, younger viewers gravitate toward mobile consumption. Data from Statista shows that viewers aged 18–34 spend over five hours per day on mobile devices, far exceeding their time spent watching broadcast or cable TV. Streaming platforms respond to this shift by optimizing content for mobile-first access and personalization.
These consumption habits reshape every corner of sports media strategy. Live sports remain among the few forms of content watched in real time, but fans increasingly expect flexibility and instant access—on phones, tablets, and connected TVs. Platforms that meet this demand gain a strategic edge.
While ESPN+ offers a deep library of sports content, its limitations are sharpest when it comes to MLB’s in-market games. Despite being a flagship asset under the Disney umbrella, ESPN must adhere to MLB’s regional broadcast rules, which exclude ESPN+ from showing live games in a viewer's home market. This effectively blocks fans from watching their favorite local teams through the app.
Consumers want seamless access, but ESPN’s current licensing structure fractures the experience. On one hand, ESPN+ broadcasts select national MLB games, offering wide exposure. On the other, fans in cities like Chicago, Boston, or Los Angeles can’t use the platform to follow their teams day to day. This disconnect suppresses potential subscriber growth and frustrates user satisfaction, especially when competitors—though still bound by many of the same blackout rules—secure exclusive digital rights with greater regional access.
The market’s direction is clear: fans favor direct-to-consumer platforms that remove friction points. Until MLB’s key agreements change, ESPN+ will struggle to match the expectations of a streaming-native audience looking for full-season access in one place.
As the competition deepens among digital platforms, content rights, regional access, and user-friendly streaming architectures will determine who dominates the next phase of live sports delivery.
Major League Baseball’s financial framework runs through media deals. In 2023 alone, the league generated over $11 billion in revenue, with a substantial portion tied directly to national and local broadcasting rights. National agreements — such as those with Fox, TBS, and ESPN — contribute roughly $1.84 billion annually, split evenly among all franchises. In contrast, local media rights vary sharply from team to team, forming a lopsided economic landscape within the league.
Take the Los Angeles Dodgers, for example. Their 25-year, $8.35 billion local TV deal with Spectrum SportsNet LA works out to about $334 million per year. That figure eclipses entire payrolls of multiple franchises. Meanwhile, the Miami Marlins’ local TV revenue sits below $20 million annually, leaving their spending flexibility dramatically constrained. Teams with stronger media positions wield more purchasing power, enabling them to outpace competitors in free agency and talent development.
This media revenue disparity feeds directly into payroll allocation. In 2023, the Mets led all of MLB with a payroll north of $330 million. By comparison, the Oakland Athletics operated close to the league minimum — spending just under $60 million. The reason isn’t ambition; it’s access. Larger-market teams lean on lucrative TV packages to subsidize higher operational costs, while smaller-markets often rely on MLB's revenue-sharing system for solvency.
Revenue sharing attempts to level the playing field, redistributing wealth from high-income teams to lower-revenue clubs. However, the effectiveness of this system is a perennial point of tension. Teams like the Yankees and Dodgers contribute more, but the results haven’t eliminated financial stratification. The broadcast economy continues to shape the competitive map of the league in real terms — through rosters, stadium investments, and front office capabilities.
Baseball defines its product not just by what happens on the field, but by who gets to watch it. In-market streaming blackouts and RSN territorial exclusivity restrict access to live games in hometown markets — an issue magnified by the recent uncertainty around ESPN’s streaming rights. If fans can’t watch their team without a cable subscription or a specific RSN, interest dwindles, particularly among younger, digital-native audiences.
When barriers like these pile up, they don’t just limit viewership — they stunt growth. New fans can’t connect with a local team they rarely see. Emerging stars fail to build regional followings. In-house promotions and youth engagement programs are less effective when the daily rhythms of the team remain invisible. For the business model to evolve with a next-generation audience, MLB must rethink how market access connects to content visibility.
ESPN’s blackout of in-market Major League Baseball games locks fans into local broadcast systems, but that could change by 2027. The current media rights framework restrains national networks like ESPN from streaming games in markets where regional sports networks (RSNs) hold exclusivity. Those limitations are embedded within agreements set to expire after the 2026 season. Once the calendar flips to 2027, ESPN may gain broader rights—pending negotiation outcomes and distribution realignments.
Nearly all existing MLB national media rights contracts—including ESPN’s deal reportedly worth $550 million annually—were finalized in or before 2021 and included restrictions on in-market streaming. As these contracts expire post-2026, media entities and MLB will sit down at the negotiating table once again. If ESPN pushes for expanded streaming flexibility and MLB aligns its blackout policies accordingly, fans could stream their home team’s games directly through the ESPN app—something not possible today under the existing blackout rules enforced by RSNs.
Any changes that take effect in 2027 will come after years of fan frustration over blackout restrictions and fragmented viewing options. ESPN could become a central hub for both national and local games if granted the rights. That scenario would reflect wider trends seen across streaming media: consumers consolidating their subscriptions, expecting on-demand flexibility, and bypassing traditional cable structures.
Between now and opening day 2027, baseball’s power brokers must assess not just the financial implications but also the shifting expectations of new generations of fans. If ESPN gains in-market streaming access, it won’t merely be a technical upgrade—it will redefine how (and where) people watch their favorite teams, inning after inning, game after game. So the question isn’t just whether ESPN will stream in-market games—it’s whether the league is ready to deliver a seamless, unified platform that mirrors how people consume entertainment in 2027 and beyond.
Delayed access to MLB streaming for in-market games creates a pivotal point for both leagues and networks. ESPN holds nationwide prestige, but without territorial rights through 2027, their baseball coverage will continue missing the mark for local fans. MLB television contracts remain vertically fragmented — ESPN can broadcast Sunday Night Baseball, but can’t stream Yankees games to New York fans on a Tuesday.
This structure reflects an outdated model that hasn't caught up with the consumption habits of 21st-century viewers. Blackout policies anchored by Regional Sports Networks may protect short-term revenue, but they obstruct broader fan access. While older contracts lean on exclusivity, newer players like Apple TV+ and Amazon Prime are making digital sports streaming the norm rather than the exception.
ESPN’s limitations point to a larger tension reshaping the sports media economy. Rights holders, broadcasters, and streaming platforms all want front-line access to high-value content — but their incentives diverge. By delaying in-market streaming until 2027, ESPN’s position in MLB’s future remains static while younger viewers stream other sports with zero restrictions.
More leagues are leaning into flexible APIs, cross-carrier partnerships, and platform-agnostic broadcasts. Baseball sits on the opposite end of that transformation. Until sports media rights 2027 reset the table, legacy blackouts and RSN-driven packages will continue cutting fans off from their local teams.
In a digital-first world, whoever controls access controls the narrative. As baseball season streaming evolves, MLB must choose between preserving traditional broadcast partners or fully embracing open access through broader licensing. The current stalemate discourages the very fan engagement that keeps the sport alive across generations.
Think about your own viewing habits. How many times have you wanted to stream a local game, only to be met with a blackout error? Multiply that frustration by millions, season after season, and you’ve got a fragmented fanbase demanding change.
How has the in-market MLB blackout shaped your experience as a fan? Comment below with your streaming struggles, clash-of-contracts confusion, or workaround secrets. Want the latest on the return of local streaming through ESPN?
ESPN may not stream in-market MLB games until 2027 — but the conversation about what comes next has already started.
©2026 American TV. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: All rights reserved. AmericanTV.com is a website for research and comparison as such, falls under "Fair Use". AmericanTV.com does not provide directly phone, TV, and internet service. All trademarks, logos, etc. remain the property of their respective owners and are used by AmericanTV.com only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. The use of any third party trademarks on this site in no way indicates any relationship between AmericanTV.com and the holders of said trademarks, nor any endorsement of AmericanTV.com by the holders of said trademarks.
We are here 24/7 to answer all of your TV + Internet Questions:
1-855-690-9884
1-855-690-9884