The term "cord cutting" no longer refers solely to cancelling cable TV. Today, it captures a broader shift — consumers not just walking away from traditional television packages, but now dropping entire cable Internet subscriptions. This evolution marks the rise of Cord Cutting 2.0: a new phase where households opt for standalone fiber and 5G services instead of bundled cable offerings.
This transition isn’t driven by cost alone. Speed, flexibility, and the rapidly changing media landscape play significant roles. With providers like Verizon and T-Mobile expanding fixed wireless access, and fiber networks multiplying across metro and suburban areas, consumers no longer feel tethered to legacy ISPs.
Meanwhile, tech giants like Google and Amazon are redrawing the boundaries of entertainment distribution. Google’s YouTube TV and Amazon’s Prime Video position them not just as platforms, but as strategic gatekeepers of content. As distribution shifts from coaxial to cloud, the center of control moves with it — and so do millions of subscribers.
The first wave of cord cutting wasn’t driven by broadband upgrades or mobile networks—it began with content. As early as 2007, Netflix introduced its streaming service, which offered subscribers instant access to a growing library of films and TV shows without a cable subscription. That simple shift changed everything.
Between 2008 and 2012, consumer behavior started to shift. Hulu and Amazon Prime Video entered the competition, providing on-demand access to television content free from rigid schedules or bundled pricing models. Viewers no longer needed coaxial connections or satellite dishes to watch their favorite series. They needed a decent internet connection and a subscription that cost significantly less than a standard cable bill.
Traditional cable and satellite providers faced triple-digit monthly bills, annual contracts, and fees layered with little transparency. That model couldn’t compete with streaming services offering content on-demand, across devices, at a fraction of the price. According to Leichtman Research Group, by the end of 2015, more than 16 million U.S. households no longer subscribed to a traditional pay TV service. Consumer frustration over inflexible pricing acted as an accelerant.
The decline accelerated when younger demographics entered the market. Millennials and Gen Z consumers viewed on-demand access and platform diversity as baseline requirements, not perks. They rejected bundled packages in favor of digital subscriptions that allowed more control over costs and content.
Another critical point: the ubiquity of high-speed internet blurred the concept of television delivery. Video-on-demand services worked equally well on smartphones, laptops, tablets, and smart TVs. Mobility became a new standard. Services like HBO Now (launched in 2015) and Disney+ (2019) meant even prestige content no longer lived exclusively behind a cable paywall.
Cord cutting was no longer a trend among tech enthusiasts; it was becoming the norm. By 2020, according to eMarketer data, over 25% of U.S. households had abandoned traditional pay TV entirely, and forecasts projected that figure to climb past 35% by 2024.
Cable and satellite could not counter the scale, personalization, or convenience of these platforms. By the time hardware like Roku, Fire TV, and Apple TV reached mainstream adoption, the infrastructure for mass cord cutting was already well in place.
The nationwide push toward fiber-optic broadband has accelerated sharply over the past several years, reshaping the digital landscape across urban centers and rural communities alike. Driven by surging demand for high-capacity, low-latency internet access, investment in fiber infrastructure continues to break records.
According to the Fiber Broadband Association (FBA), 2022 marked the highest annual fiber deployment in the history of the U.S., with more than 7.9 million new fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) locations built. This brings the total to over 68 million homes passed by fiber. Fiber now reaches over 60% of U.S. households, and industry forecasts suggest this figure will surpass 80% by 2027.
Much of this growth stems from national and regional ISPs increasing capital expenditures dedicated to fiber buildouts. Federal funding—such as the $42.45 billion BEAD program under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act—has further accelerated expansion into underserved markets.
Fiber internet delivers consistent performance across multiple dimensions. Unlike legacy cable connections, fiber offers:
For households working remotely, streaming in 4K or 8K, or managing smart home ecosystems, fiber provides the bandwidth and reliability traditional cable cannot sustain.
Google Fiber re-entered growth mode in 2022 and now serves 15 metro areas, including Kansas City, Austin, and Huntsville. In Utah, its Provo network achieved gigabit speeds for under $70/month. Beyond the tech giant, regional providers such as Metronet, Sonic, Ting, Lumen, and EPB in Chattanooga have captured market share by offering affordable, high-speed connections backed by localized support.
EPB’s smart grid-powered network stands out—Chattanooga became the first U.S. city to offer 10 Gbps residential service citywide as early as 2015. That infrastructure now enables a tech ecosystem contributing over $2.7 billion annually to the local economy.
Municipalities and cooperatives are stepping in where large ISPs have not. Over 900 communities now operate some form of municipal broadband network. States like Colorado and Vermont lead in enabling local governments and electric co-ops to deploy fiber—in many cases offering faster, cheaper service compared to private incumbents.
In 2023, Colorado voters approved over two dozen municipal broadband expansions in a single election cycle. The majority of these initiatives are fiber-based, signaling a shift from cable-centric broadband models to community-controlled networks prioritized for reliability and affordability.
5G is no longer just a mobile buzzword. In cities and suburbs alike, it's reshaping home internet access. With fixed wireless access (FWA) powered by 5G, households are replacing cable connections with wireless routers capable of delivering speeds rivaling traditional broadband. What was once seen as supplementary now stands as a primary home internet option.
5G home internet excels in dense urban neighborhoods, where fiber deployment can be logistically challenging or delayed by infrastructure constraints. Equally, in underserved rural areas where cable infrastructure either underperforms or doesn't exist, 5G offers an accessible alternative. Instead of trenching lines or installing new hardware, providers beam high-speed internet straight to home-based receivers, bypassing last-mile bottlenecks.
Verizon and T-Mobile have positioned 5G FWA as a cornerstone of their consumer offerings. By early 2024, Verizon’s 5G Home Internet service reached over 40 million households, offering average download speeds between 85 to 300 Mbps, with peak speeds reaching 1 Gbps in millimeter wave (mmWave) zones. T-Mobile reports more than 4 million subscribers for its Home Internet product, pushing aggressively into both urban sprawls and rural counties. Their shared strategy: simplicity, flat-rate pricing, and nationwide rollout backed by expanding low-band and mid-band spectrum usage.
Early doubts about wireless home internet reliability are fading fast. Independent testing from Ookla and RootMetrics confirms year-over-year stability gains across major metro markets. Consumers now report greater satisfaction with 5G fixed wireless than with DSL or satellite, and newer households show growing preference for mobile-carrier-based internet setups. Signal boosters, self-install kits, and transparent speed disclosures have built trust where confusion once reigned.
Not long ago, wireless home broadband felt experimental. Today, it powers millions of households—and its footprint grows by the month.
U.S. cable giants are shedding subscribers at record pace. In Q3 2023 alone, Comcast lost 490,000 video customers and 18,000 broadband subscribers, according to the company's earnings report. Charter Communications, which operates under the Spectrum brand, also saw a decrease of 320,000 video customers in the same quarter. These are not anomalies—they signal deep structural shifts in how Americans consume media and access the internet.
Between 2019 and 2023, major cable and satellite providers collectively lost more than 25 million traditional pay-TV subscribers, based on data from Leichtman Research Group. This equates to over 25% of their customer base within just four years.
Legacy bundles once promised convenience and savings; today, they represent complexity and inflation. Monthly invoices from providers like Cox, Comcast, and Spectrum often exceed $200 when combining internet, TV, and hidden fees such as regional sports surcharges or broadcast TV fees. Many households now question the rationale behind paying for rigid channel packages when most of their preferred content is attainable through standalone apps or digital platforms.
Despite years of customer satisfaction campaigns, service quality remains a persistent weakness. The 2023 American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) gave subscription television services an average score of 66 out of 100—among the lowest across all measured industries. Long hold times, billing errors, and poor technical support have pushed even long-time customers to explore mobile-first ISPs and digital streaming bundles.
Traditional cable models struggle to adapt to the on-demand generation. Younger demographics, particularly Gen Z and Millennials, show little interest in fixed programming schedules or bloated channel lineups. Platforms like YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, and Sling cater to modern viewing habits with intuitive interfaces, cloud DVRs, and personalized recommendations.
Meanwhile, legacy operators remain reliant on legacy contracts with broadcasters, which often restrict distribution flexibility. This lack of innovation has transformed the bundle from a selling point into a liability.
The post-cable entertainment landscape keeps reshaping itself with the rapid evolution of streaming platforms. No longer dominated by a handful of players, the market now features a sprawling lineup that stretches far beyond Netflix and Hulu. This rise in diversity has led to fragmented content libraries, competitive licensing deals, and an increasingly complex web of subscription choices.
Content consumers must now navigate a distributed environment where access to popular shows and live events often requires multiple subscriptions. Disney+ holds exclusive rights to Marvel and Star Wars franchises, HBO Max delivers HBO Originals and Warner Bros. films, while Amazon Prime Video layers entertainment on top of its retail ecosystem. Each service curates its catalog with exclusivity in mind, pushing viewers to stack rather than replace platforms.
Access to premium live sports and first-run movies has become a critical battleground. Google's YouTube TV struck a seven-year deal to stream NFL Sunday Ticket starting with the 2023–2024 season—a move that broke DirecTV's longstanding hold on the package. Amazon locked down exclusive rights to Thursday Night Football, while ESPN+ continues ramping up its UFC coverage and NHL broadcasts. These alliances shift the axis of sports viewing away from traditional cable providers.
Platform identity now rests heavily on original programming. Netflix’s "Stranger Things," Max’s "Succession," and Prime Video's "The Boys" all serve as case studies in user retention driven by exclusive storytelling. Original content accounts for over 40% of viewing time across the major platforms, according to Nielsen’s 2023 State of Play report. The effect is measurable: Netflix experienced a 14% bump in quarterly subscriptions after the release of its popular “Wednesday” series.
Consumers increasingly build their own bundles, selecting among ad-supported tiers, live TV add-ons, and niche services like Crunchyroll or CuriosityStream. This à la carte approach offers more control and often saves cost, especially when paired with over-the-air antennas and free streaming channels like Pluto TV or The Roku Channel. While cable once offered one-size-fits-all bundles, the current model bends to individual viewing habits, screen time preferences, and budget constraints.
The telecom space no longer belongs exclusively to legacy providers. A new wave of internet service providers is disrupting the landscape, introducing competition that’s shifting customer expectations and rebalancing market control.
Municipal broadband projects are gaining traction as city governments respond to local demand for affordable, high-speed internet. According to the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, over 600 U.S. communities now operate some form of publicly owned broadband network. Cities like Chattanooga, TN and Longmont, CO have pioneered gigabit fiber solutions that outperform national ISPs on speed, price, and service reliability.
Satellite internet is undergoing its own transformation. Led by Starlink, SpaceX’s low-earth-orbit satellite system had an estimated over 2 million subscribers globally by Q1 2024, with the majority concentrated in North America. While speeds fluctuate, latency averages under 40 ms—previously unheard of for satellite connections.
In an increasingly competitive field, providers are leaning into aggressive pricing. T-Mobile's Home Internet service, for example, offers a flat monthly rate of $50 with no annual contract, taxes, or fees. Verizon’s 5G Home Internet prices range between $25 and $70 per month depending on wireless plan bundling. This transparent and simplified pricing model directly contrasts with the legacy cable model, which often hides fees and promotes introductory pricing that expires.
Customer service, once an afterthought, now plays a central role in ISP brand identity. New entrants like Ting and MetroNet promote localized customer support, rapid installation windows, and the absence of data caps or throttling policies. Industry surveys from J.D. Power show higher satisfaction scores for these challengers compared to the largest incumbents.
Telecoms and ISPs are no longer content to compete solely on speed. By pairing internet service with curated streaming discounts, providers create new value propositions. Verizon bundles Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ through its +Play platform, while T-Mobile offers Netflix and Apple TV+ as loyalty incentives on premium plans. These content-additive strategies blur the once rigid lines between ISPs and entertainment delivery.
The financial logic is clear: customers are up to 23% more likely to stay subscribed for 12 months or longer when streaming bundles are included, according to internal data released by Verizon in late 2023.
Google and Amazon, traditionally infrastructure providers in the form of cloud computing and CDN distribution, are eyeing direct access to the consumer. Google Fiber has expanded into over a dozen U.S. markets, setting a symmetrical speed standard of 2 Gbps for $100 per month with world-class uptime and routing performance.
Not to be outdone, Amazon’s Project Kuiper prepares to launch its first LEO satellites in 2024, with stated targets of providing low-latency broadband to underserved areas. The retail giant is also actively exploring bundled Prime benefits that would integrate home internet access, marking its clearest move yet into last-mile delivery.
These movements from tech giants signify a shift in strategy: from enabling content distribution to managing the connectivity pipeline itself, verticalizing the user experience from signal to screen.
Households are no longer passive consumers of content—they’re high-bandwidth, multi-device, always-on ecosystems. From Zoom calls in the home office to late-night gaming sessions and binge-watching in ultra-high definition, consistent download and upload speeds have transitioned from luxury to necessity.
Fiber and 5G home internet platforms are rising to meet this demand, delivering symmetrical speeds that DSL and cable can’t match. Many residential users now treat upload speeds with the same level of scrutiny as downloads, especially remote workers and streamers who rely on real-time data transmission.
More households are bypassing traditional plans in favor of gigabit-level service. A 2023 survey by Leichtman Research Group found that 32% of broadband subscribers now pay for speeds of 1 Gbps or higher. This shift signals more than an appetite for speed; users are aligning their internet connections with future-proof expectations.
Consumers aren't just choosing the fastest option—they're analyzing incremental cost per megabit. Providers like AT&T Fiber, Verizon Fios, and T-Mobile 5G Home Internet now offer gigabit service that's both competitive and accessible, especially in urban and suburban zones. In areas where fiber isn't yet available, 5G high-band networks are closing the gap by offering gigabit-class performance without the costly physical infrastructure.
Wi-Fi thermostats, smart speakers, video doorbells, cloud-connected appliances—each device layered onto your home network adds to its cumulative load. As of 2023, the average U.S. household had over 22 connected devices, according to Deloitte’s Digital Media Trends report. That number is expected to grow, driven by mainstream adoption of platforms like:
In practice, a slow or inconsistent connection can cause issues like delayed responses in voice commands, lag in video feeds, or failures in scheduled automation. Fiber and 5G networks, built with high throughput and low-latency requirements in mind, provide the foundation for seamless smart home functionality, making them the preferred choice for tech-forward customers.
Switching from traditional cable TV and bundled internet services to a combination of streaming platforms paired with fiber or 5G internet produces tangible savings. Across the U.S., consumers paying an average of $217.42 per month for cable packages can cut costs to well below $130 monthly when combining a fiber or 5G internet plan with à la carte streaming services.
Take an average scenario: a household replaces a $100/month cable TV plan and a $90/month traditional internet package. Opting for $60/month fiber internet alongside $40 in streaming subscriptions (e.g., Netflix, Disney+, Hulu) reduces the monthly bill by approximately $90. Over a 12-month period, that change returns more than $1,000 in savings.
5G home internet offers similar benefits. Providers like T-Mobile and Verizon advertise plans between $40 and $60 per month with no required bundles, contracts, or added equipment fees. When combined with carefully selected streaming platforms, even moderate users rarely exceed $100 monthly, while maintaining higher speeds and flexibility.
Several technology platforms and ISPs now offer planning tools to quantify potential savings. Tools like the Antennas Direct Cord Cutting Calculator and Roku’s Switch Planner allow users to enter current cable bills, preferred channels, and internet usage levels to preview their monthly and yearly savings before making the leap. These platforms generate side-by-side comparisons, factoring in streaming options, equipment requirements, and potential over-the-air alternatives.
AT&T, Spectrum, and Verizon also include in-house assessment tools, guiding customers toward customized internet-only plans or streaming-based TV packages.
Beyond savings, flexibility holds equal appeal. Students in university housing opt for mobile 5G hotspots combined with streaming apps and free ad-supported platforms. Families configure multiple streaming accounts — one account on Disney+, another on Max — to match the preferences of different age groups. Meanwhile, digital nomads rely on a mix of portable 5G modems and flexible month-to-month service plans to stay connected worldwide without overpaying.
Unlike rigid cable bundles, modern setups can grow or shrink without penalties. Pausing a streaming platform during vacation or switching internet providers without early termination fees means users avoid being locked into overpriced long-term commitments.
Consumers are not just cancelling cable — they’re replacing paid platforms with entirely free options. The growth of Free Ad-Supported Streaming Television (FAST) has exploded. In 2023 alone, FAST platforms like Pluto TV, Tubi, and The Roku Channel reached 37% year-over-year growth in viewing hours, according to Nielsen’s Gauge Report.
These platforms provide hundreds of channels replicating the linear experience of cable TV — local news, classic sitcoms, reality programming — without requiring a monthly fee. For households looking to eliminate television spending altogether, pairing a FAST service with free over-the-air antenna broadcasts represents a zero-cost alternative for daily entertainment.
The shift away from traditional cable bundles to fiber and 5G-connected streaming has reorganized the flow of capital in the entertainment world. Streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, and Max now attract a lion's share of both subscriber payments and advertising budgets. According to Magna Global, U.S. digital video ad spend reached $47.1 billion in 2023, towering over linear TV’s $36.7 billion. This redirection of funds enables platforms to finance original projects at a scale once exclusive to network giants.
Legacy broadcasters have responded by creating streaming arms — NBC with Peacock, CBS through Paramount+, and Disney with its eponymous platform. But the revenue still leans heavily toward digital-first ecosystems, where user data better tracks ad engagement.
While cable TV once dictated gatekeeping on who could tell stories, platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Twitch now empower creators with direct access to global audiences. Consider this: over 500 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute, with ad revenue shared directly with creators through the YouTube Partner Program.
These decentralized platforms cultivate niche communities, test new formats, and reward engagement over pedigree — a dramatic departure from traditional production models.
Streaming services don't guess what their audiences want — they know. Netflix analyzes viewer data across genres, geography, completion rates, and pause times to decide what gets greenlit. In one notable case, the success of international programming like “Squid Game” — which drew over 1.65 billion viewing hours in its first four weeks — has driven a surge in global localized content investment.
Content teams rely on granular engagement metrics rather than Nielsen ratings or box office returns. This shift has led to shorter development cycles, genre experimentation, and algorithm-friendly releases. Binge-worthy series drop entire seasons at once, while short-form content caters to mobile-first viewers.
Traditional media companies no longer operate in sealed silos. Consolidation with tech firms reflects a necessary move to compete in the ecosystem reshaped by fiber and 5G. One of the most emblematic deals: Amazon’s $8.45 billion acquisition of MGM in 2022, integrating legacy film libraries into Prime Video’s on-demand strategy.
These examples confirm a decisive pivot: media giants are becoming tech adopters, forging partnerships or absorbing innovations that once disrupted them. Content may still be king — but distribution, powered by next-gen internet, now rules the kingdom.
Households have moved decisively toward high-speed, flexible internet-first services, rejecting outdated bundles in favor of customized, mobile-first experiences. At the core of this shift lies a set of interlinked drivers: better connectivity through fiber and 5G, streaming content that traverses genres and formats, and an industry forced into reinvention by increasingly discerning digital-first consumers.
Empowered by unlimited data, faster upload/download speeds, and near-zero lag, users continue to reclaim agency over how, when, and where they consume media. Choice now defines the experience. Whether it’s a niche streaming app or a multi-gigabit symmetrical connection from an emerging regional fiber provider, each component of the stack reflects an individualized approach to entertainment and connectivity.
What does it all mean for the average consumer? Fewer legacy constraints and more room to architect a digital lifestyle with pinpoint precision. Cord Cutting 2.0 hasn’t just disrupted TV—it’s reshaped expectation. Watching what you want isn’t the goal anymore; it’s orchestrating an experience that works for your schedule, wallet, data cap, and taste in drama, all at once.
©2025 American TV. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: All rights reserved. AmericanTV.com is a website for research and comparison as such, falls under "Fair Use". AmericanTV.com does not provide directly phone, TV, and internet service. All trademarks, logos, etc. remain the property of their respective owners and are used by AmericanTV.com only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. The use of any third party trademarks on this site in no way indicates any relationship between AmericanTV.com and the holders of said trademarks, nor any endorsement of AmericanTV.com by the holders of said trademarks.
We are here 24/7 to answer all of your TV + Internet Questions:
1-855-690-9884
1-855-690-9884