Even as TV streaming continues to capture more viewing hours and influence household entertainment habits, a surprising trend has emerged: most Americans have no plans to buy a new Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, or Google TV in 2025. Despite heated competition among device makers and advances in platform integration, consumer interest in hardware upgrades is cooling significantly.
Streaming usage is surging—by the end of 2023, streaming services accounted for nearly 38% of total TV usage in the U.S., according to Nielsen's The Gauge. So why aren’t viewers eager to invest in newer streaming hardware? What's motivating the collective pause on upgrading?
After nearly a decade of rapid expansion, the streaming hardware market is showing signs of stagnation. According to a 2024 survey by Parks Associates, only 3% of American broadband households plan to purchase a new streaming media player in the next year. This marks the lowest intent rate since 2015. The broader consumer electronics category saw a similar cooling, but streaming boxes and sticks have taken a particularly sharp hit.
Sales volumes have flatlined. Data from Circana (formerly NPD) reveals that U.S. unit sales of streaming devices have dropped by 14% year-over-year in Q1 2024, while overall revenue in this segment declined by 11%. In contrast, categories like smart TVs and soundbars show flat or modest growth, suggesting a shift in priority from add-on devices to integrated solutions.
Roku continues to lead the U.S. market in terms of streaming player shipments, although its growth curve has flattened. As of Q2 2024, Roku held 36% of the plug-in streaming device market by volume, followed by Amazon Fire TV at 28%, Google Chromecast/TV at 19%, and Apple TV trailing with 6%, based on Insider Intelligence estimates. Despite strong brand recognition and a loyal user base, none of the top four players posted positive year-over-year growth in hardware sales.
Google’s latest Chromecast with Google TV update landed with minimal impact, while Apple's hardware—though powerful—continues to struggle with price sensitivity. Roku and Fire TV maintain volume leadership, but both are experiencing churn as households delay upgrading and repurposing older devices.
TV manufacturers have quietly undercut the streaming hardware market by building advanced streaming functionality directly into their products. Samsung, LG, TCL, and Vizio all now offer native access to most major apps—from Netflix to Max—bypassing the need for external streaming boxes entirely. Samsung’s Tizen OS and LG’s webOS have matured to the point of parity with standalone players in streaming performance and UI responsiveness.
This hardware consolidation is affecting buyer behavior. In 2024, over 70% of smart TV owners reported not using any external streaming player, according to Deloitte’s Digital Media Trends report. The "good enough" principle now governs most hardware decisions. Once the TV itself streams reliably, adding another middleman becomes less relevant.
So, where does this leave things heading into 2025? Streaming hardware is entering a twilight phase—still viable, but no longer essential. Consumers are choosing platforms they already own or built-in solutions arriving with the TV out of the box. New buyers have slowed, and the return-on-investment curve for these devices keeps getting steeper.
A March 2024 survey from Parks Associates reveals that only 14% of U.S. broadband households plan to purchase a new streaming media player—such as Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, or Google TV—within the next 12 months. That’s a marked decline from 26% expressing similar intentions in mid-2021.
This trend isn't isolated. Consumer Intelligence Research Partners (CIRP) found a similar downturn: interest in standalone streaming devices dropped year-over-year by 9 percentage points as of Q1 2024. At the same time, reported preferences for device bundling through smart TVs or gaming consoles saw a marginal uptick.
Three dominant themes surface across consumer sentiment studies: price sensitivity, device fatigue, and economic caution. With inflation-adjusted prices affecting discretionary electronics spending, a $179 Apple TV 4K unit becomes a harder sell—especially when many households already possess at least one capable streaming solution.
Historically, U.S. households have shown enthusiasm for upgrading every two to three years. That cycle has now stretched, with many consumers citing “no compelling reason” to upgrade. According to Deloitte’s 2024 Digital Media Trends report, 61% of users believe their current streaming hardware “does everything they need.”
Rather than buying new hardware, Americans continue to channel entertainment dollars into content. Nielsen’s 2024 State of Play report shows a 12% year-over-year growth in streaming service subscriptions per household, averaging at 4.7 platforms per subscriber. Netflix, Apple TV+, and Max are benefiting from this behavioral shift.
Consumers are making strategic choices. When asked whether they’d rather spend $100 on a new device or six months of content access, 72% opted for streaming subscriptions, according to a Forrester Research panel conducted in February 2024.
The appetite for content hasn’t diminished—only the medium of access is evolving. Why invest in new hardware when the current setup already hosts every show, film, and live event in demand?
Streaming behavior has changed faster than hardware manufacturers anticipated. While cord-cutting continues its steady rise, consumer attention has shifted from devices to content. The numbers underline this transformation: according to Leichtman Research Group, by the end of 2023, 54% of U.S. households no longer subscribed to a traditional pay-TV service—a significant leap from 41% five years earlier.
But this migration doesn’t imply a willingness to invest in more hardware. Instead, users rely on what they already have—built-in smart TV interfaces, gaming consoles, or previously purchased streaming devices. The center of interest isn't the vessel. It's the flow of content into the screen.
Scroll through a typical household’s monthly statements, and a pattern emerges. Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, Paramount+, Max, Peacock, Apple TV+, Prime Video—the list grows, not shrinks. According to data from Antenna, the average U.S. streaming household paid for 4.5 streaming subscriptions as of Q3 2023—a number that has doubled in just four years. This stacking behavior reflects a strong preference for on-demand access over ownership or frequent hardware upgrades.
The result isn’t expansion. It’s fatigue. Viewers rotate platforms based on current content, cherry-picking shows and letting subscriptions lapse when interest fades. This dynamic churn—a marked shift from past loyalty to single platforms—reflects content exploration, not device dependency.
Streaming habits in 2025 reflect a commitment to content rather than long-term hardware investments. This “subscribe, not buy” approach to digital entertainment means consumers prioritize flexibility. They don't want more remotes. They want options that can be swapped, paused, or resumed with a few clicks or taps.
Physical hardware upgrades come with friction: setup, cost, compatibility issues. In contrast, digital subscriptions offer immediacy. That choice—from a user perspective—isn’t hypothetical. It’s habitual. And it directly explains why most Americans are not planning to buy a new Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, or Google TV in 2025.
Roku enters 2025 with the largest installed base among U.S. streaming platforms, yet growth metrics have begun to plateau. According to a 2024 Leichtman Research Group study, Roku devices are present in 71% of U.S. broadband households that own a smart TV or connected TV device. However, purchase intent has stalled. NPD’s Connected Home Forecast shows a double-digit year-over-year drop in new Roku device purchases projected for early 2025. High brand awareness offers no guarantees when replacement cycles lengthen and the feature gap between generations shrinks.
Software enhancements like Roku OS 12 haven’t proven compelling enough to drive large-scale hardware upgrades. Households are largely content with current models, and smart TV manufacturers integrating Roku OS eliminate the need for standalone boxes or sticks. Roku’s long-standing advantage has pivoted into a source of stagnation—ubiquity without incentive to upgrade.
Fire TV devices face a different kind of stall—one born from abundance. Amazon’s multi-tier strategy, including Fire TV Sticks, Fire TV Cube, and integration in its own smart TVs, has saturated its core base. The Consumer Technology Association’s 2024 report cited that 79% of Prime households already own at least one Fire TV product. For these users, there's no pressing reason to buy another.
Amazon’s yearly refresh cycle hasn’t delivered significant hardware innovation or exclusive features to drive demand. The company leans heavily on Alexa integration and promotional bundling, yet increasingly, consumers see little added value in upgrading. As more of Amazon's content lives on other platforms, the proprietary advantage diminishes, and with it, so does unit growth.
Apple TV 4K delivers industry-leading hardware specifications and seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem. However, mass-market traction remains elusive. According to Parks Associates, Apple TV claims less than 10% of the U.S. streaming device market, and by Q1 2025, purchase intent continues trending downward.
The challenge isn't performance—it’s positioning. Many consumers access Apple TV+ through other platforms, eliminating the need for Apple-branded hardware. While power users and loyalists value continuity across Apple devices, the $129+ price tag deters new buyers when $30 competitors provide access to identical content. For now, Apple appears content prioritizing service over scale in this category.
Google TV still hasn't stepped out of Android TV’s shadow. Despite rebranding efforts and UI optimizations, consumer perception remains fragmented. A 2024 Deloitte Digital Media Survey showed Google TV awareness lagging behind Roku, Amazon, and even Apple.
Chromecast with Google TV offers a low-cost entry point, yet lacks a compelling reason for users to choose it over better-marketed alternatives. Google’s challenge lies in its hybrid identity—part platform, part aggregator, part hardware seller—all without a clear value proposition. Without a flagship TV partnership or standout features, Google TV remains in orbit, rarely the center of attention or purchase plans.
Consumers no longer need to unbox an additional streaming stick or set-top device to watch Netflix, Hulu, or Disney+. Most new televisions from Samsung, LG, Hisense, and TCL arrive with pre-installed streaming ecosystems. These built-in platforms—Tizen, webOS, and Google TV among them—offer direct access to the most-used apps without the friction of extra remotes or ports.
Samsung’s latest Tizen OS supports native integration for services like Netflix, YouTube, Apple TV+, Hulu, HBO Max, and even niche platforms such as Crunchyroll and Pluto TV. LG's webOS mirrors this coverage, delivering a similarly robust content environment complemented by its own content discovery features. Google TV, embedded in Sony and other partner models, adds personalized recommendations and voice control tailored through Google's ecosystem.
Convenience is guiding purchase decisions. With fewer people willing to spend on secondary hardware, built-in systems that “just work” meet expectations. Home setups are simpler. Fewer cables, fewer inputs, and one unified interface. No account syncing across multiple devices. No need to remember where the Roku remote went. The television has become the platform.
This integration goes beyond passive viewing. Smart TVs now consolidate streaming, gaming, and media browsing into a single environment. Samsung Gaming Hub, for example, enables cloud gaming services like Xbox Cloud Gaming directly from the TV—no console required. LG's Game Optimizer places latency controls and display enhancements in a centralized menu. Users toggle between Netflix, Fortnite, and fitness apps without switching devices.
So ask this: if your TV already gives you access to everything you watch—and increasingly, everything you play—what need remains for a Fire TV Stick or Apple TV box? For many Americans heading into 2025, that answer is clear: none.
In 2025, inflation is no longer spiking as it did in 2022, but prices remain substantially higher than pre-pandemic benchmarks. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) climbed 3.2% year-over-year as of January 2025, sustaining pressure on American household budgets. Meanwhile, interest rates remain elevated—Federal Reserve data shows the federal funds rate is holding at 5.25%—which directly impacts credit card APRs and personal loan costs. As borrowing gets more expensive, non-essential purchases like streaming hardware fall down the priority list.
Consumers are reallocating discretionary income. Instead of buying a standalone streaming device, many are opting to invest in monthly experiences. Deloitte’s 2024 Digital Media Trends Survey revealed that 53% of Gen Z and 51% of Millennials prefer spending on entertainment subscriptions over new hardware. This includes services like Netflix, Spotify, and Apple One, which bundle music, TV, cloud storage, and gaming into a single recurring payment. Streaming hardware lacks that bundled, multi-function appeal, making it easier to postpone or avoid entirely.
Travel spending is also back. The U.S. Travel Association reported a 9% increase in leisure travel bookings year-over-year in Q1 2025, pointing to Americans valuing trips, events, and real-world engagement over incremental tech upgrades.
Fewer people are buying new doesn’t mean they’re not buying at all. Refurbished streaming devices now represent a growing section of the market. According to IDC, 16% of streaming media player sales in late 2024 were certified refurbished units—up from just 9% in early 2023. Retailers like Amazon, Best Buy, and Walmart have expanded their pre-owned and renewed programs, offering older Roku, Fire TV, and Apple TV models at steep discounts.
This behavior reflects a more cost-conscious consumer, one who weighs practicality over novelty. For devices that deliver access to the same apps and services with only marginal performance differences, buying new seems unnecessary to a majority of Americans in 2025.
By 2025, most American households have at least one major streaming platform device—Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, or Google TV—already plugged into their televisions or tucked behind the screen. Many have more than one. The landscape doesn’t lack access; it overflows with it.
This widespread device ownership leads to a straightforward result: replacement demand plummets. Consumers who bought a 4K streaming stick in 2021 aren’t feeling pressure to upgrade. Why would they, if the performance still holds up, and their favorite apps continue to run smoothly?
Streaming hardware hasn’t experienced a meaningful leap since the widespread rollout of 4K HDR compatibility. The latest models from leading brands may offer slightly faster processors, streamlined interfaces, or voice improvements. But “slightly better” doesn’t convince most users to toss out a functional product.
Unlike smartphones or laptops—where touchpoints like battery life, camera systems, and portability influence the upgrade cycle—streaming devices remain static in function. As long as content streams without buffering and app navigation remains intuitive, there’s little incentive to spend $50–$200 on a new dongle or box.
"It still works" is the anchor thought shaping this shift. When asked why they weren’t interested in upgrading their streaming hardware in 2025, more than 61% of surveyed users pointed to device sufficiency, according to data from Parks Associates. They understand how to use their remote, their apps are synced, and the interface feels familiar. Change invites inconvenience.
Stability outweighs surprise. Any new features—advanced recommendation engines, minor latency improvements, or subtle UI overhauls—fall short of revolution. Consumers waiting for the “next big leap” are left unmoved.
Why upgrade when everything already works exactly as intended?
Streaming hardware brands have entered a cycle of fragmented competition where differentiation grows increasingly marginal. Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, and Google TV all promise access to the same core services—Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Max—with interfaces that continue to converge in design and usability. For consumers, this leads not to excitement but to decision fatigue. When every remote feels the same and every menu offers the same content tiles, selection becomes a chore rather than a choice.
Brands once enjoyed clear identity markers: Roku as the budget-friendly essential, Apple TV as the premium ecosystem, Fire TV as Amazon’s shopping and viewing extension, and Google TV aiming for AI-driven personalization. By 2025, these distinctions blur. Each platform now supports 4K HDR, voice search, companion apps, and aggregation features. When features standardize, perceived value declines—and with that, purchase intent drops.
The competition among streaming platforms has shifted from introducing meaningful innovation to preserving market share. Roku, which controlled 36% of U.S. connected TV platform usage in Q3 2023 according to Statista, maintains a slim lead. Amazon Fire TV remains closely competitive, while Google TV and Apple TV operate with narrower user bases but higher per-user engagement. These numbers fluctuate quarterly, yet the broader trend stays consistent: growth is plateauing across the board.
Manufacturers continue releasing updated hardware—minor processor upgrades, redesigned remotes, modest interface refinements—but average consumers rarely notice, let alone care. The same YouTube loads just as smoothly on a $39 Fire TV Stick as on a $129 Apple TV 4K. The result? A crowded aisle of indistinct black boxes vying for attention that never arrives.
Overlaying this fatigue is the steady advance of Smart TVs, which integrate Roku OS, Fire TV, Google TV, or proprietary interfaces directly into the display. The convenience of skipping an added device appeals to buyers looking to declutter their setups. And as TV manufacturers align closely with one streaming partner per product line, they reduce the perceived need for add-ons.
This overlap amplifies redundancy in the market. Buying a Roku device feels unnecessary when the TV already runs Roku OS out of the box. Platforms are fighting for external device sales against their own embedded software—an internal cannibalization that drains momentum from the market overall.
Roku, once the standard bearer for mainstream streaming hardware, no longer commands the brand stickiness it once enjoyed. In 2025, more users view streaming content ecosystems as service-first rather than device-first. The platform they access—whether it's YouTube, Apple TV+, Peacock, or Twitch—weighs more heavily in their decision-making than which piece of hardware delivers it. Cross-platform availability has eroded the concept of “buying into” a single brand’s hardware cycle.
When every major streaming service is available across Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Google TV, game consoles, and smart TVs, sticking with one device brand offers few real advantages. Consumers upgrading in 2025 don’t prioritize which logo is printed on their remote—they’re focused on experience, speed, and price. This behavioral change underscores why most Americans see little reason to purchase a new Roku, Fire TV, or similar box next year.
The emotional and practical tie once forged between consumers and a device brand has weakened. In its place, platform loyalty has emerged. Viewers track shows, creators, or sports franchises—then log in wherever access proves easiest. That ease no longer requires purchasing specific hardware. As streaming platforms standardize availability across ecosystems, the entire premise of brand-driven hardware upgrades has worn thin.
In 2025, the equation has shifted. Most Americans are not planning to buy a new Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, or Google TV—and the reasons are layered, not linear. Economic pressure, technological saturation, and changing viewing habits have rewritten the rules of the living room.
Streaming more no longer requires buying more. Households are tapping into built-in TV platforms, sticking with older but still functional devices, or casting directly from their phones. Hardware refresh cycles have slowed dramatically, not because enthusiasm for streaming is declining, but because the devices already in use are "good enough" by most standards.
Pragmatism has taken the front seat. Inflation and softened discretionary spending forced consumers to reassess what’s worth upgrading. A new remote hardly justifies another $50 to $200 spend when access to Netflix, Disney+, and Prime Video remains seamless on existing setups.
Technologically, the streaming space has plateaued. Dolby Vision, 4K support, and fast user interfaces have become standard across brands and price tiers. Without a must-have innovation driving demand—as 4K or voice assistants once did—there’s little incentive to replace working hardware.
For streaming brands, this means a pivot. Roku, Apple, Amazon, and Google can’t rely on set-top box revenue alone. Their growth will come from service ecosystems—ad-tech infrastructure, subscription bundling, and platform-level content delivery. Roku has already leaned into advertising and original programming. Apple continues to integrate its TV+ with broader ecosystem perks. Each company knows the next battle is for screen time, not shelf space.
So, what does the new equation look like? Users stream more, but buy less. Households consolidate devices, not expand them. And brands, if they want to stay relevant, must think beyond boxes toward building loyalty through seamless, value-added digital experiences.
©2025 American TV. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: All rights reserved. AmericanTV.com is a website for research and comparison as such, falls under "Fair Use". AmericanTV.com does not provide directly phone, TV, and internet service. All trademarks, logos, etc. remain the property of their respective owners and are used by AmericanTV.com only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. The use of any third party trademarks on this site in no way indicates any relationship between AmericanTV.com and the holders of said trademarks, nor any endorsement of AmericanTV.com by the holders of said trademarks.
We are here 24/7 to answer all of your TV + Internet Questions:
1-855-690-9884
1-855-690-9884